For the unnormalized angular-frequency transform,
After normalization, the Fourier transform extends unitarily to . For integrable and , inversion and Fubini give the identity directly.
With the Fourier convention , translation by multiplies the transform by . The Plancherel theorem gives the displayed correlation identity for every square-integrable function, by extension from integrable square-integrable functions. Thus distinct integer translates are orthogonal exactly when the nonzero integer Fourier integrals of vanish. The products in both integrals are integrable by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.
For , apply Fourier inversion on a locally compact abelian group at the identity to , whose transform is . This proves the displayed norm identity on . Density and completeness give a unique linear isometric extension to all . On it agrees almost everywhere with the integral Fourier transform on a locally compact abelian group.
If a finite measure on has square-integrable Fourier transform, the Plancherel theorem gives an inverse transform . Pairing with every Schwartz function and using Fourier inversion identifies the measure with . This establishes absolute continuity, rather than presuming it. For a positive measure, and as well. Multiplication by yields .

Ancestors (5)

  1. Fourier analysis
  2. Analysis
  3. Area of mathematics
  4. Mathematics
  5. Home

Discussion (0) New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

Articles by others on the same topic (2)

The Plancherel theorem is a fundamental result in the field of harmonic analysis, particularly in the context of Fourier transforms and Fourier series. It establishes an important relationship between the \( L^2 \) spaces of functions and distributions, indicating that the Fourier transform is an isometry on these spaces.
Plancherel theorem by Ciro Santilli 40 Updated 2025-07-16
Some sources say that this is just the part that says that the norm of a function is the same as the norm of its Fourier transform.
Others say that this theorem actually says that the Fourier transform is bijective.
The comment at math.stackexchange.com/questions/446870/bijectiveness-injectiveness-and-surjectiveness-of-fourier-transformation-define/1235725#1235725 may be of interest, it says that the bijection statement is an easy consequence from the norm one, thus the confusion.