Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 16 4 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Again assume the intended trace Ricci curvature bound , and put . Compactness from the Bonnet-Myers theorem ensures that the diameter is attained: choose with . For , the open balls and are disjoint, because a point in both would violate the triangle inequality.
The clearly stated Bishop volume comparison with a positive-curvature model from part (b), applied between radius and radius , givesHere both radius- ball volumes equal the total volume, as shown in part (b). The symmetry givesThe two lower bounds therefore sum to , while disjointness bounds that same sum above by . Both inequalities must be equalities. In particularLetting , the local Euclidean volume asymptotic gives one on the left. Thus , and the detailed equality proof in part (b) applies. We obtainThis proves maximal diameter rigidity from disjoint comparison balls directly, including the required equality argument.
The literal trace interpretation again has a counterexample. On with , the Ricci curvature equals . For the product Riemannian metric, distances satisfy : every product curve has length at least by the integral triangle inequality, and a pair of constant-speed minimizing factor geodesics attains it. ConsequentlyThe mixed sectional curvature is zero, so this manifold is not . The stronger bound, or normalized Ricci curvature convention, is essential.