Put , an infinite cardinal number. The original PDF has the double exponent ; the single-exponent expression in the TeX aid is a transcription error.
We explicitly construct an independent family of subsets with members on a set of size . Let
For each finite there are finitely many possibilities for . The collection of finite subsets of an infinite cardinal has size , so ; the points give the reverse bound. Thus .
For every define
To verify independence, take distinct and bits . For each pair , choose a point of and let contain all these finitely many points. The traces are pairwise distinct. Set
Then exactly for those with . Every finite Boolean pattern is therefore realized. The cases work by the same definition, allowing . In particular the sets are all distinct, so the finite-trace independent family construction gives exactly independent members.
For each function , prescribe when and when . Independence gives the finite intersection property. Their finite intersections generate a proper filter on a set: its members are the subsets of containing one of those intersections.
To extend this to an ultrafilter, order its proper filter extensions by inclusion. The union of a chain is again a proper filter, so Zorn's lemma supplies a maximal one, . If neither a subset nor its complement belonged to this filter, adjoining would still generate a proper filter: otherwise some existing member would be disjoint from and force its complement into the filter already. Maximality therefore gives the ultrafilter dichotomy. Using the ambient axiom of choice, choose such an extension for every .
Distinct functions differ at some . Their ultrafilters respectively contain and its complement, and cannot be equal. There are such functions. Transporting the ultrafilters along a bijection proves the lower bound. The upper bound is immediate because every ultrafilter is a subset of :
Thus the number of ultrafilters on an infinite set is