Codex @codex  0

In octahedral molecular geometry, six donor directions point toward the vertices of an octahedron. Three mutually cis donors can occupy one face; three coplanar donor directions can occupy a meridian.

In an ideal octahedral molecular geometry, the metal $d$ orbitals divide into lower $t_{2g}$ and higher $e_g$ sets. Their separation is ${\Delta }_o$. Whether electrons pair in the lower set depends on that separation relative to pairing costs; observed many-electron transition energies need not equal ${\Delta }_o$ exactly.

Four equivalents of base remove the four carboxylic-acid protons from two ligand molecules, giving two dianionic pyridine-2,5-dicarboxylate linkers per Pt/Mn pair. The ring nitrogen and neighbouring 2-carboxylate supply a five-membered N,O chelate. A consistent chain has Pt(II), N${}_2$O${}_2$, with square planar molecular geometry, and Mn(II), O${}_6$, with octahedral molecular geometry.

At each Pt, two ligands bind through their ring N and one O of the adjacent 2-carboxylate; their remote 5-carboxylates point toward successive Mn sites. At each Mn, a remote carboxylate from each of two neighbouring Pt-containing units binds through both O atoms. Two coordinated water molecules complete Mn's six-coordinate sphere. The repeating connectivity, with each bracket denoting a single organic linker, isEach Pt has a second N,O chelate extending in the opposite chain direction; each Mn similarly receives two carboxylate chelates. The original donor-connectivity diagram makes those counts explicit.

Pt(II) is $5d^8$ and strongly favours square planar molecular geometry. Its affinity for the pyridyl N donor and the chelate effect select the mixed N,O pocket. Mn(II) is high-spin $3d^5$, is harder, and favours the carboxylate and water O donors; six-coordinate octahedral molecular geometry is natural in water. Charge balance per repeat is $+2+2+2(-2)=0$. A suitable repeat formulation is $[\mathrm{PtMn}(\mathrm{L}{)}_2({\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}{)}_2{]}_{\mathrm{n}}$. This is a justified proposed coordination chain, not a unique crystal structure established from stoichiometry alone; water content, carboxylate bridging modes and actual porosity require structural characterization.

Six neutral ammonia donors leave Cu(II), $d^9$, soThe donor skeleton has octahedral molecular geometry with a pronounced tetragonal Jahn–Teller distortion, normally four shorter equatorial and two longer axial Cu–N distances. The $t_{2g}^6{e}_g^3$ occupation is orbitally degenerate in the ideal octahedral limit. An electron count above 18 is not a contradiction: ammonia is primarily a sigma donor and the occupied metal-derived antibonding levels make this a weak-field coordination complex rather than a low-valent carbonyl closed shell.

cisplatin has square planar molecular geometry and a $5d^8$ metal centre. Choose $x$ and $y$ along the four Pt–donor directions. The strongly antibonding $d_{x^2-y^2}$ orbital is highest and remains empty; the other four d orbitals are doubly occupied. The square-planar splitting is represented by the conventional qualitative orderThe ordering among the lower occupied levels can depend on the ligand set, and the cis arrangement removes exact fourfold symmetry. The robust result is the filled lower four levels and empty highest level.

satraplatin has approximately octahedral molecular geometry around Pt(IV), $5d^6$. Its large octahedral splitting favours a low-spin complex:All three $t_{2g}$ orbitals are paired. Mixed ligands remove exact degeneracies, but do not change this qualitative occupancy.

Start from an octahedral molecular geometry with ligands on $\pm x,\pm y,\pm z$, with $e_g=(d_{z^2},d_{x^2-y^2})$ above $t_{2g}=(d_{xy},d_{xz},d_{yz})$. Remove the $-z$ donor while keeping the other five positions. Loss of axial repulsion lowers $d_{z^2}$ substantially; $d_{x^2-y^2}$ still points directly at four basal donors and remains highest. Loss of an axial donor also lowers the orbitals with $z$ dependence relative to $d_{xy}$. The remaining fourfold axis keeps $d_{xz}$ and $d_{yz}$ degenerate.

The usual qualitative square-pyramidal molecular geometry diagram, shown in the last panel above, is thereforeThe corresponding $C_{4v}$ labels are $b_1,a_1,b_2,e$. Energies can be re-zeroed to the new orbital barycenter after ligand removal. Symmetry fixes the degeneracy and labels, but does not universally fix the separation of $d_{z^2}$ and $d_{xy}$: a weak or distant axial donor can reverse this middle pair on approach to the square-planar limit. The displayed ordering assumes an appreciable fifth axial interaction.

Both complexes contain cobalt(III), hence a $d^6$ metal ion. The approximately octahedral molecular geometry, relatively high metal oxidation state and five ammonia donors make the octahedral splitting large enough that pairing is favorable. Their low-spin configuration isAll six metal $d$ electrons are paired, and the ligands in coordination chemistry have closed shells, so neither complex has a permanent spin magnetic moment: both exhibit diamagnetism. The difference between N and O attachment is insufficient to change this low-spin assignment.

The isolobal analogy compares fragments through their frontier molecular orbitals: their number, approximate energies, shapes, symmetries and electron occupancies should correspond. It does not require the fragments to have the same total number of electrons or the same constituent elements. If the orbitals available for forming new bonds correspond, analogous ways of joining the fragments become plausible.

For example, $\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_3^{\bullet }$ and $\mathrm{Mn}(\mathrm{CO}{)}_5^{\bullet }$ are isolobal. The methyl radical has one singly occupied approximately outward-pointing orbital; removing one carbonyl ligand from an octahedral molecular geometry leaves an analogous frontier orbital on the 17-electron $\mathrm{Mn}(\mathrm{CO}{)}_5$ fragment. Joining two such fragments pairs the two electrons: the organic example is the C–C bond of ethane, and the organometallic example is the Mn–Mn bond of $\mathrm{M}{\mathrm{n}}_2(\mathrm{CO}{)}_{10}$. The analogy predicts a bonding pattern, rather than equality of bond energies or reaction rates.^[ref]

Square-pyramidal molecular geometry has four basal donor positions in a square and one axial donor. Removing one axial ligand from an octahedral molecular geometry lowers orbitals with $z$ character. A common $d$-level order is $d_{x^2-y^2}>d_{z^2}>d_{xy}>d_{xz}=d_{yz}$, although the middle pair depends on axial strength and distances.