The usual Pressure-opacity zones of a Shakura--Sunyaev thin disk, in order of increasing cylindrical radius, are an inner region dominated by radiation pressure and electron-scattering opacity, a middle region dominated by gas pressure and electron-scattering opacity, and an outer region dominated by gas pressure and the Kramers opacity law, often approximated by free-free opacity. The boundaries depend on mass, mass accretion rate, and the alpha disk viscosity parameter. At sufficiently large radius, accretion-disk self-gravity or changes in ionization can invalidate this three-zone model.
For the inner region write
Here is the standard thin-disk dissipation flux through one face, and is the innermost stable circular orbit treated as a zero-torque inner boundary. The given factor in the dissipation rate is appropriate to one face. For Keplerian rotation, it is .
Let denote the disk scale height or vertical half-thickness, not the full thickness. In vertical hydrostatic equilibrium, the leading vertical acceleration is , so a one-zone estimate gives
In the inner zone, . For an optically thick medium with constant electron-scattering opacity, radiative diffusion gives the emergent one-face flux
Equivalently, combine with vertical pressure balance. Equating the radiative flux to the dissipated flux yields the radiation-supported inner-disk height:
Order-unity vertical-profile factors depend on the precise height convention. The central mass cancels at fixed physical mass accretion rate, because both vertical gravity and local dissipation are proportional to .
If and , this can also be written
The radiation-supported height rises from the formal zero at toward the approximately constant value . That zero is not a reliable description of the physical plunging region: the radiation-dominated approximation and the Newtonian zero-torque formula fail very close to the inner edge.
Beyond the inner zone, the height grows slowly with radius rather than staying on that plateau forever. Far from the inner boundary, the standard gas-pressure scalings give in the electron-scattering zone and in the Kramers zone. These follow from with and , respectively. A schematic profile is
vertical half-thickness H
  ^
  |                                               / outer gas/Kramers
  |                                          ____/
  |                                     ____/ middle gas/scattering
  |              ______________________/
  |          ___/ inner radiation/scattering plateau
  |       __/
  |     _/
  +----|----------------------------------------------> radius R
      R_*              zone boundaries are schematic
The height formula also tests the thin disk assumption. For a nonrotating hole with , the largest in this inner approximation occurs at . At and , it is about , so a disc this close to the conventional Eddington accretion rate is only marginally thin. Slim accretion disk effects and advected heat can then matter.
Analyze a local temperature perturbation at fixed radius and fixed surface density of a disk . The thermal timescale of an accretion disk is shorter than its viscous timescale, so mass redistribution is negligible during the perturbation. Let be viscous heating and radiative cooling, measured consistently through one face or both faces, and define net cooling by . A temperature increase is unstable if it decreases net cooling.
With gas pressure dominant, vertical hydrostatic equilibrium and the ideal gas law give
For the alpha disk prescription with temperature-independent , , and the Keplerian rotation heating law is
One must not hold the steady-state fixed while perturbing the temperature: the stress and heating respond through , even though is temporarily fixed.
At an equilibrium temperature where , if and , then
The cooling exponent therefore decides the sign.
For hot, ionized, optically thin gas, the usual intended cooling model is thermal bremsstrahlung, whose volume emissivity scales as . Integrated vertically,
Thus , and
A hotter annulus expands vertically, lowering its density enough to offset the direct increase in bremsstrahlung emission; viscous heating still rises.
For an optically thick medium with the Kramers opacity law, at fixed . Thermalized radiative diffusion gives
Its falling opacity lets a hotter annulus radiate much more efficiently.
For an optically thick medium with dominant electron-scattering opacity, is nearly independent of temperature. Provided enough true absorption is present to thermalize the radiation,
This conclusion differs from the thermal instability of a radiation-pressure-dominated alpha disk, where the heating has a different temperature dependence. The question explicitly excludes that pressure regime.
The first conclusion needs its cooling assumption stated. alone does not guarantee that thermal bremsstrahlung dominates; atomic-line cooling, ionization changes, external illumination, or energy advection can change the answer. For a general optically thin emissivity , the corresponding exponent is
Accordingly, under the same fixed- alpha prescription,
The unstable/stable/stable classification is the standard free-free/diffusion answer, rather than a universal result specified by temperature and optical depth alone.