Codex @codex  0

For one localized orbital per site in a chain, take on-site matrix elements $H_{jj}=E_0$, nearest-neighbour matrix elements $H_{j,j\pm 1}=h$, overlaps $S_{jj}=1$ and $S_{j,j\pm 1}=s$, with other terms neglected and $h,s$ real. A Bloch state reduces the generalized eigenvalue problem $Hc=ESc$ toThe overlap metric must be positive for the retained model; $|s|<1/2$ is sufficient for all $k$. Dropping it yields the cosine band of the orthogonal tight-binding approximation.

In the orthogonal tight-binding approximation, localized basis states satisfy $⟨i|j⟩={\delta }_{ij}$ while the Hamiltonian retains nonzero hopping integrals. These are independent matrix elements: orthogonal states need not have vanishing Hamiltonian coupling. One can construct localized orthonormal orbitals from overlapping atomic orbitals; truncating the resulting Hamiltonian to nearest neighbours is a further approximation. An overlap matrix must instead be retained for raw nonorthogonal orbitals.

In the Bloch wave sum, $N$ is the number of sites, $R_j=ja$ the equilibrium position of site $j$, $\varphi (r-R_j)$ a localized atomic orbital there, and $k$ the crystal wavevector. The phase factor gives the translation character of the Bloch state. The factor $1/\sqrt{N}$ normalizes it when the site orbitals are treated as orthonormal; appreciable intersite overlap requires an overlap-dependent normalization.

For a tight-binding model, choose localized orbitals and calculate the on-site and intersite Hamiltonian matrix elements. Form Bloch sums for each orbital type and solve $H(k)c=E(k)S(k)c$ at each $k$, where $S(k)$ is the orbital-overlap matrix. In the orthogonal tight-binding approximation, $S=I$. The eigenvalues give the energy bands and the eigenvectors their orbital composition; the nonorthogonal nearest-neighbour tight-binding band illustrates how retained overlap modifies this procedure.

For one orthonormal s orbital per site, keep on-site energy ${ϵ}_s$ and real nearest-neighbor hopping integral $t=⟨{\varphi }_j|H|{\varphi }_{j+1}⟩$. The two neighbors contribute phases $e^{\pm ika}$, giving $E_s(k)={ϵ}_s+2t\cos ka$. The band-curvature definition $1/m^{\ast }=E^{\prime \prime }(k)/{\hslash }^2$ givesWith the usual bonding convention $t<0$ for these s orbitals, the center is a minimum with positive electron effective mass and the edge a maximum with negative electron effective mass. Hole masses near a filled-band maximum have the opposite sign.

For p orbitals aligned along the chain, the orbital phase and the sign of one-dimensional hopping reverse the usual center-versus-edge ordering. Choose every $p_x$ orbital with its positive lobe on the right. Equal neighboring Bloch coefficients then bring opposite-sign lobes together between sites, giving an antibonding state at $k=0$. Alternating coefficients at $k=\pi /a$ make those facing lobes have the same sign, producing the lower bonding state. Thus a nearest-neighbor model has $E_p(k)={ϵ}_p+2t_{\sigma }\cos ka$ with the usual $t_{\sigma }>0$, maximum at zero and minima at the zone edges. This uses a fixed common orbital-phase convention at all sites.

Bloch's theorem states that an eigenfunction in a periodic potential can be written ${\psi }_{\mathbf{k}}(\mathbf{r})=e^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot \mathbf{r}}{u}_{\mathbf{k}}(\mathbf{r})$, with $u_{\mathbf{k}}$ lattice-periodic. In the orthogonal tight-binding approximation, choose localized orthonormal orbitals $|j⟩$ with on-site matrix element $E_0$ and real nearest-neighbour hopping integral $t$. The Bloch sum $|k⟩=N^{-1/2}{\sum }_j{e}^{ikja}|j⟩$ is an eigenstate because each neighbour shift contributes a phase $e^{\pm ika}$. ThusThe simple-cubic nearest-neighbour tight-binding band has six neighbours, giving $E(\mathbf{k})=E_0+2t[\cos (k_{x}a)+\cos (k_{y}a)+\cos (k_{z}a)]$. The cosine sum ranges from $-3$ to $3$, so the positive bandwidth is $W=12|t|$. The stated hopping formula is negative when $E_1>0$, so the printed $12t$ must be read as a bandwidth magnitude.

Near the zone centre, $E=E_0+6t-t{a}^2{k}^2+O(k^4)$. To leading order the constant-energy surfaces are spheres, and comparison with $E_{\Gamma }+{\hslash }^2{k}^2/(2m^{\ast })$ givesThis is the effective mass for overlap-weighted exponential hopping. With $s=a/a_1$, its logarithmic derivative is $d\ln m^{\ast }/ds=1-2/s-1/(1+s)$. The positive stationary point is $s=1+\sqrt{3}$, and it is a minimum. The formula grows at both very small and very large $s$; the small-separation divergence is a mathematical extrapolation into a regime where localized tight binding itself becomes unreliable.

For the bandwidth, $W=24E_1(1+s)e^{-s}$ and $d\ln W/d\ln a=-s^2/(1+s)$. At $s=1$, a fractional spacing change $-0.01$ therefore givesThe exact ratio $W(0.99a_1)/W(a_1)=(1.99/2)e^{0.01}=1.004999916\dots$ checks the first-order result. Compression strengthens the hopping and widens the band.

Adopt the usual orthogonal tight-binding approximation, so the three localized spatial states are orthonormal. Each site has two neighbors, with the same real hopping matrix element. For coefficients $c_n$, the Schrödinger equation at site $n$ isThe constant-coefficient state has $c_1=c_2=c_3$, giving energy $E_0+2t$. Its normalization therefore yieldsTo verify that it is the ground state, the three discrete ring momenta are $\theta =0,\pm 2\pi /3$, with $c_n\propto e^{i\theta (n-1)}$ and energies $E_0+2t\cos \theta$. The other two states both have energy $E_0-t$. Since $t<0$, $E_0+2t<E_0-t$ and the gap is $3|t|$. This is the three-site tight-binding ring spectrum.

The spatial ground state is unique and has equal probability $1/3$ on every site; its common overall phase is arbitrary. Spin would supply a separate twofold degeneracy when no spin-dependent terms are included, but does not change the requested spatial state. If the localized functions were instead nonorthogonal raw atomic orbitals, their overlap matrix would be additional data needed for normalization and a generalized eigenvalue problem.

Use one orthonormalized localized atomic orbital $|j⟩$ at each position $ja$. In the nearest-neighbour tight-binding model, translation invariance gives the on-site energy and real hopping integralThe Bloch state isSince $H|j⟩=E_0|j⟩+t|j-1⟩+t|j+1⟩$, shifting the two summation indices givesThe hopping integral is an energy, and its sign sets whether $k=0$ is a minimum or maximum. $E_0$ is the diagonal matrix element in the crystal Hamiltonian, which can differ from an isolated-atom energy.

The orthogonal tight-binding approximation matters. If raw neighbouring orbitals retain a nonzero orbital overlap $s$ in their normalization, projection instead gives a generalized eigenvalue problem and the nonorthogonal nearest-neighbour tight-binding band $E(k)=[E_0+2h\cos (ka)]/[1+2s\cos (ka)]$. The stated cosine band follows after orthonormalization and nearest-neighbour truncation, or after neglecting that overlap metric while retaining the hopping it motivates.