Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 23 3 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Suppose are two final-discrete-fibration factorizations. Apply the orthogonality of final functors and discrete fibrations to the square with left side , top , bottom and right side . It gives a unique satisfying and . Reversing the roles gives .
Both and fill the same square for , so uniqueness gives ; similarly . This proves the uniqueness of a final-discrete-fibration factorization: the connecting functor is a canonical isomorphism, not just a noncanonical equivalence.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 23 3 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
We prove the orthogonality of final functors and discrete fibrations. For , finality supplies an object of . Lift through the discrete fibration , obtainingIf in the comma category, then , and is a lift of with codomain . Uniqueness of that lift makes its domain equal to . Thus ; since the comma category is a connected category, equality propagates along every zigzag. Define to be this common object.
For , choose . Lift into , obtaining . Then lifts into , so its domain is by the preceding construction. Define . The unique lifting property of a discrete fibration proves and , and gives .
At , use ; its lift is , so . Both and are lifts of with the same codomain, hence agree. Therefore .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 25 3 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Write the square as , with final and a discrete fibration. For , choose an object of the nonempty comma category . Lift uniquely to an arrowover , and tentatively put .
A morphism in this comma category is an arrow with . The composite is a lift of with codomain . Uniqueness of lifts gives , including equality of their source objects. Since the comma category is connected by zigzags, is independent of the choice. Thus is well defined and .
For , take . Lift into , obtaining . Composing with gives a lift of into , whose source must be . Hence . Set . Uniqueness of this lift makes the definition independent of the chosen comma object and proves and .
At , choose . Its lift is , so . For , is the unique lift of into , so . We have constructed the required functor with and .
If is another filler, must equal by unique lifting. Thus for every object. Its arrows are then forced by unique lifting into those objects. ThereforeThis proves the orthogonality of final functors and discrete fibrations.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 119 2 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Use the square's notation . For , choose in the nonempty connected category . Lift through the discrete fibration , obtaining the uniquely determined arrowDefine . If satisfies , then is a lift of with codomain . Uniqueness makes it exactly , including equality of its domain. Connectedness of the comma category therefore makes independent of the chosen object, with strict equality rather than merely an isomorphism.
For , choose and lift with codomain . Write this lift as . Its composite with is the lift of to , so its domain is . Set . The lift of an identity is an identity, and the composite of two lifts is the lift of the composite with the specified codomain. Thus is a functor, and .
At , choose ; its lift is , giving . For , the unique lift of with codomain is , giving on arrows as well. Finally, any other filler must send to the same lift of with codomain , so ; it must also send to the unique lift of with codomain . This proves orthogonality of final functors and discrete fibrations:
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 iii Paper 119 3 i Solution 2026-09-28
Consider the commutative squarewhere is a final functor and is a discrete fibration. For , choose an object of the nonempty comma category . Commutativity gives an arrowLift it uniquely through with codomain , and define to be the domain of this lift.
This definition does not depend on the choice of . A morphism in the comma category satisfies . The composite of the lift of with is then a lift of with codomain , so uniqueness of discrete-fibration lifts says that it is the chosen lift and has the same domain. Since is connected, all choices give the same object .
Two factorizations of one functor have a unique connecting functor in each direction, by the orthogonality of final functors and discrete fibrations. Their composites and the identity fill the same lifting square, so uniqueness makes both composites identities. The intermediate categories are therefore canonically isomorphic.