Take without loss of generality, since its definition fixes only . With , the steady-branch minimum expands as . For fixed positive , the source's supplied approximation therefore gives
Thus the requested inequality follows from the supplied approximation, with equality at first order when . If negative is retained, replace it by throughout.
There is an independent source-consistency issue with calling that supplied expression the oscillatory threshold of the displayed model. Linearizing about conduction, the modes decay separately and the characteristic polynomial is
Writing it as , a nonzero imaginary pair requires and , by the Routh-Hurwitz stability criterion. Direct algebra gives the oscillatory threshold of a thermosolutal Lorenz model
Consequently, with ,
The two factors of in the supplied threshold are interchanged. For example , , gives a genuine marginal imaginary pair at , whereas the supplied first-order expression gives . The intended comparison remains true after correction:
This comparison applies to a physical Hopf bifurcation when and to an interior steady fold when . For fixed nonzero and fixed , both conditions hold for sufficiently small positive . At a vanishing squared difference, neglected terms must be examined before drawing a higher-order conclusion.