Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 iii Paper 13 6 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be the real tautological line bundle over . A homogeneous polynomial of degree defines a section of the real line bundleIndeed, on a projective line its restriction satisfies , exactly the transformation law for a linear functional on . Its zero set is well defined without treating an odd-degree polynomial as a global real-valued function on projective space.
Put . This is the nonzero generator: the tautological line changes sign along the generating projective loop. Dualization preserves this sign, while tensoring multiplies transition signs, soFor generic coefficients both polynomial sections are transverse to zero and their zero curves meet transversely. This genericity follows from parametric transversality: at each projective point some coordinate is nonzero, and varying the coefficient of its th power varies the section's value freely; the two polynomial coefficient sets vary the two values independently. The common zero set is consequently a zero-dimensional submanifold of a compact space, and is finite.
We justify the needed parity of zeros of a real line-bundle section. Along a closed loop transverse to the zero curve, trivialize the pulled-back line bundle on the cut interval. At a simple zero the real component function changes sign. The product of these sign changes equals the sign of the bundle's transition around the loop, which is the evaluation of its first Stiefel–Whitney class. Therefore the intersection parity of the zero curve with every loop equals the evaluation of on that loop. This says that its mod-two Poincare dual is , so
The mod-two Poincare duality intersection rule givesThere are no orientation signs in these coefficients, so every transverse intersection contributes one. Two distinct projective lines meet in exactly one point; both have dual class by the preceding degree-one calculation. Hence , andThis proves the parity of real projective plane-curve intersections.
Equality with need not hold. Choose , , with the line and conicOn the line, the conic equation becomes , which has no nonzero real solution. Thus . Both real curves are smooth and nonempty, and they are disjoint, so their real intersection is transverse vacuously. Even over the complex numbers they meet in two distinct transverse points and ; the example is not a tangency or shared-component exception. On the unit sphere has a positive minimum, so disjointness also persists under sufficiently small real coefficient perturbations, so it is compatible with the generic real situation.