= Solution
A ligand <symmetry orbital> can mix with a metal combination only if their irreps match. Since the donor levels lie below the metal levels, mixing produces a lower ligand-dominated bonding orbital and a \b[higher metal-dominated antibonding orbital]. In a two-level model with $\epsilon_d>\epsilon_L$,
$$
\Delta\epsilon_d\simeq\frac{|V_{dL}|^2}{\epsilon_d-\epsilon_L}>0.
$$
The requested metal-dominated levels are shown in the right-hand column; the lower ligand-dominated partners are deliberately outside this diagram.
\Image[/past-exam-of-the-chemistry-a-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2024/paper-1-ligand-perturbation.png]
{title=Original qualitative effect of lower ligand sigma orbitals on the ten metal-dominated levels}
The $d_{x^2-y^2}$ lobes point directly at the chlorides, so their $b_{1g}$ and $b_{2u}$ combinations are strongly destabilized. The $d_{z^2}$ combinations $a_{1g},a_{2u}$ can also interact through their equatorial density. The $e_u,e_g$ symmetries have ligand partners, so weaker shifts are symmetry-allowed; their local nearest-neighbour sigma overlap vanishes in the ideal planar geometry, making their shifts much smaller in that approximation. Symmetry allowance alone never sets an overlap integral's size.
There are no ligand sigma combinations of $B_{2g}$ or $B_{1u}$ symmetry, so the $d_{xy}$-derived delta pair is unaffected by the stipulated sigma-only mixing. In particular the low $b_{2g}(\delta)$ level survives while the other delta bonding channel becomes strongly metal–ligand antibonding. The plotted spacings and ordering of remote unoccupied levels are schematic; the robust conclusion is the four low Mo–Mo bonding orbitals separated from antibonding or strongly ligand-destabilized orbitals.
Back to article page
