A presheaf on is an arrow in sets. A morphism of presheaves is a commuting square. Define
A commuting square from to is determined by its map , while a square from to is determined by its map . A square from to is also determined by its map , because the other component is the unique map . Therefore these Hom-set bijections establish the adjoint chain for evaluation in an arrow category:
There is a further left adjoint to : . A square is exactly a map , proving .
There is no right adjoint to . If there were, would be a left adjoint and preserve the initial object. But it sends the empty set to , whereas the initial object of this arrow category is . They are not isomorphic. Hence does have a left adjoint, while has no right adjoint.
Let be the discrete category on , and the indiscrete category, with exactly one morphism between each ordered pair of objects. A functor is precisely a map ; a functor is precisely a map . Thus .
Let be the set of connected components, where objects are related by finite zigzags of morphisms in either direction. A functor must take the endpoints of every morphism to the same point, so it is exactly a map . This gives the adjoint chain for the objects of a category
It cannot extend to the left. The two functors from the terminal category to selecting distinct objects have empty equalizer in . Applying gives two identical maps between singleton sets, whose equalizer is a singleton. Thus does not preserve equalizers and cannot be a right adjoint.
It cannot extend to the right either. The coproduct of two copies of in is the discrete two-object category. But is the indiscrete two-object category, with morphisms between its distinct objects. They are not isomorphic, or even equivalent. Hence does not preserve binary coproducts and cannot be a left adjoint. Neither end of this chain has a further adjoint.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.