Expand in the given spanning set:Some must be nonzero, since otherwise would lie in the span of the earlier , contradicting linear independence. Reorder the remaining so . Solving this equation for expresses it in terms of . Every member of the old spanning set is therefore in the new span, so the replacement set still spans . This proves the needed step of the Steinitz exchange lemma directly.
Starting with , apply that replacement successively to . After steps the spanning list is together with unreplaced 's. If , after replacements the list spans , forcing to be a linear combination of it. That contradicts linear independence. Hence .
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.