Measure the logarithmic surface brightness slope in resolved radial annuli after accounting for instrumental blurring and foreground emission. Between a halo core and its outer boundary, dark-matter decay radiation predicts , whereas dark-matter annihilation radiation predicts ; doubling radius therefore reduces the respective surface brightness by factors and . These are quantitative templates to compare with independently mapped stellar and gaseous components.
An exponential galactic disk has , so and . At the latter is about , much faster decline than either halo template, and the projected emission should also be flattened along the galactic disk. A galactic bulge described by a Sérsic profile has ; for and , this is about at and continues to steepen, whereas a pure halo power law keeps a fixed slope.
For a stellar halo with outer luminosity density proportional to , the projection of a spherical power-law emissivity gives . Illustratively, -- gives projected slopes --: then rises strongly outward, but annihilation can resemble the steeper stellar template. Gas-related gamma emission must be compared with observed gas columns and the cosmic ray distribution; it is not always proportional to optical light.
A shallow, extended, approximately spherical component is particularly distinctive; an component needs additional evidence. Fit the stellar, gas and halo templates together over a broad radial range, including morphology and emission spectra. A measured slope alone cannot uniquely identify dark matter, since stellar or gas profiles can coincide with a halo slope over a limited interval.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.