Put . The posterior is , andThe denominator is positive for . For , both parameters exceed one and the mode simplifies to . For this is the uniform-prior mode, exactly ; for the endpoint or symmetric cases also make the mode rule coincide with . Otherwise it is generally a different rule. The posterior mean agrees with only at .
To find the minimax estimator under quadratic loss, consider the posterior mean . Its risk function isFor , the numerator is identically , soThis constant-risk binomial proportion estimator is the unique Bayes estimator for its proper beta prior under quadratic loss. A competing rule's maximum risk is at least its risk averaged over that prior, which is at least this Bayes risk. The constant-risk rule attains the bound, so the posterior mean in (iii) is the unique minimax rule. Consequently any coincident rule is minimax too: the mean in (i) is the same rule when , and the mean in (ii) is the same rule when . No posterior mode listed here equals that mean rule for every observation, since at its value is positive whereas their endpoint modes differ from it. This accounts for the small- coincidences as well as the general answer.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.