Write . The covariant Yoneda lemma gives the natural bijectionwhose inverse sends to the natural transformation with component . This also identifies the two variables' naturality.
To prove that is a projective object in a category, let be an epimorphism in the functor category and . By pointwise epimorphism in a functor category, lift through the surjective function . The Yoneda lemma turns this lift into with .
For a small category, the set of pairs with indexes the canonical mapIt is natural, and every is the image of . Thus it is an epimorphism, establishing the projective cover of a set-valued functor by representables construction. Here cover means a projective presentation; no minimality is asserted.
For the equivalence's first step, if is a monomorphism, then , the map , is injective for every . Hence every representable functor is a monofunctor. Conversely, injectivity of every is exactly left cancellation against every , so it implies that is a monomorphism. Therefore
Assume (b). A coproduct in a category of monofunctors in is again a monofunctor: at an object it is the disjoint union of the values, and every arrow acts within the same summand by an injective function. Distinct summands cannot become identified, and injectivity within a summand follows from its monofunctor property.
Apply this to the coproduct of representable functors constructed in part (a). Its canonical map to is a pointwise epimorphism in a functor category. Thus every is an epimorphic image of a monofunctor, proving
Assume (c), and take an epimorphism with a monofunctor. Since is a projective object in a category, there is a natural transformation with . A retract in a category of a monofunctor is a monofunctor: if , then naturality of gives , injectivity of gives , and applying gives . Thus (c) implies (b), completing
The stronger assertion that every set-valued functor is a monofunctor holds exactly when is a groupoid. Sufficiency follows because a functor preserves inverses, so sends every arrow to a bijection.
For necessity, fix , and form the pointwise pushout in a categoryusing twice the natural transformation given by precomposition with . At an object , consists of two copies of , with the two copies of identified for every . No different underlying elements are identified: each generating relation simply joins the two copies of one element. In , the two copies of coincide, since . Hence sends the two copies of in to the same element. If is a monofunctor, those copies of coincide. The description of the pushout implies for some . Thus every morphism is a split monomorphism.
Apply the same conclusion to : there is with . Then , and so as well. Every arrow is invertible, proving
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.