Normalize the discrete valuation by , and put . For , define its ramification numberand set . The minimum exists: all finite values are nonnegative integers, and a nonidentity automorphism moves some integral element. The lower ramification numbering isThus , is the inertia group, and is the wild inertia group. This states the convention at integer endpoints as well as between them. Automorphisms preserve , so these are normal subgroups of .
Define the Herbrand function and its inverse byThe integrand is positive and piecewise constant. Since for sufficiently large , the function is continuous, strictly increasing and unbounded, and its inverse is defined on all nonnegative reals. The upper ramification numbering isIn particular, the denominator in the Herbrand integral involves , even when is not totally ramified. These conventions are also given in Milne's Class Field Theory, Chapter I, §4.
Now use the monogenic hypothesis . Since is Galois, its minimal polynomial has the distinct conjugates as roots, soTaking valuations proves the first equality.
For every polynomial , the difference is divisible in by . Every element of is such a polynomial value, and taking the element attains the resulting lower bound. HenceFor an integer , the element lies in exactly the groups ; if , it lies in none. Summing this count over the nonidentity elements and interchanging the two finite sums givesThis proves the ramification-group sum for a monogenic integer ring. Equivalently it is the different exponent from ramification groups, since the different ideal is generated by under the same monogenic hypothesis.
The polynomial is Eisenstein at , so a root generates a totally ramified cubic field and is a uniformizer of . Its cubic discriminant isIts -adic valuation is , so it is not a square. The cubic discriminant criterion therefore givesThe unique quadratic subfield is generated by . Since the permitted square root is in , this subfield isIt is totally ramified of degree two, by the Eisenstein polynomial . The ramification index of is divisible by both the index of and the index of . Since the whole degree is , it follows thatIn particular .
We use the following standard facts about totally ramified extensions: every uniformizer generates the valuation ring over the base valuation ring, and for a totally ramified Galois extensionThus we can use the uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups. Put . Since and ,is a uniformizer of .
Let be the three roots. The Galois group acts transitively on their unordered pairs and preserves the valuation, so all differences between distinct roots have the same valuation . The discriminant identity giveshence . Thus, for any , either or has valuation .
A nontrivial three-cycle fixes , since it fixes the quadratic subfield, and sends to a different root. Also : write the sum as , whose two terms have unequal valuations . ThereforeA transposition changes the sign of . ConsequentlyThe numerator has valuation : it is plus terms of strictly higher valuation if the root changes, and exactly if the root is fixed. Thus every transposition has . We conclude that the ramification groups of the splitting field of T3 minus 3T plus 3 over Q3 are
As an independent check, the cubic field has and different exponent . The extension is tamely totally ramified of degree two, so its different exponent is . The different in a tower gives , agreeing with the ramification sum .
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.