Normalize the discrete valuation by , and put . For , define its ramification number
and set . The minimum exists: all finite values are nonnegative integers, and a nonidentity automorphism moves some integral element. The lower ramification numbering is
Thus , is the inertia group, and is the wild inertia group. This states the convention at integer endpoints as well as between them. Automorphisms preserve , so these are normal subgroups of .
Define the Herbrand function and its inverse by
The integrand is positive and piecewise constant. Since for sufficiently large , the function is continuous, strictly increasing and unbounded, and its inverse is defined on all nonnegative reals. The upper ramification numbering is
In particular, the denominator in the Herbrand integral involves , even when is not totally ramified. These conventions are also given in Milne's Class Field Theory, Chapter I, §4.
Now use the monogenic hypothesis . Since is Galois, its minimal polynomial has the distinct conjugates as roots, so
Taking valuations proves the first equality.
For every polynomial , the difference is divisible in by . Every element of is such a polynomial value, and taking the element attains the resulting lower bound. Hence
For an integer , the element lies in exactly the groups ; if , it lies in none. Summing this count over the nonidentity elements and interchanging the two finite sums gives
This proves the ramification-group sum for a monogenic integer ring. Equivalently it is the different exponent from ramification groups, since the different ideal is generated by under the same monogenic hypothesis.
The polynomial is Eisenstein at , so a root generates a totally ramified cubic field and is a uniformizer of . Its cubic discriminant is
Its -adic valuation is , so it is not a square. The cubic discriminant criterion therefore gives
The unique quadratic subfield is generated by . Since the permitted square root is in , this subfield is
It is totally ramified of degree two, by the Eisenstein polynomial . The ramification index of is divisible by both the index of and the index of . Since the whole degree is , it follows that
In particular .
We use the following standard facts about totally ramified extensions: every uniformizer generates the valuation ring over the base valuation ring, and for a totally ramified Galois extension
Thus we can use the uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups. Put . Since and ,
is a uniformizer of .
Let be the three roots. The Galois group acts transitively on their unordered pairs and preserves the valuation, so all differences between distinct roots have the same valuation . The discriminant identity gives
hence . Thus, for any , either or has valuation .
A nontrivial three-cycle fixes , since it fixes the quadratic subfield, and sends to a different root. Also : write the sum as , whose two terms have unequal valuations . Therefore
A transposition changes the sign of . Consequently
The numerator has valuation : it is plus terms of strictly higher valuation if the root changes, and exactly if the root is fixed. Thus every transposition has . We conclude that the ramification groups of the splitting field of T3 minus 3T plus 3 over Q3 are
As an independent check, the cubic field has and different exponent . The extension is tamely totally ramified of degree two, so its different exponent is . The different in a tower gives , agreeing with the ramification sum .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.