Let
The set contains zero. If and , then by comparison. Moreover, if the original power series diverges at , no can lie in , because absolute convergence at would imply absolute convergence at . Thus is finite and nonnegative.
If , choose with ; comparison gives absolute convergence at . If and the series converged at , then its terms would be bounded. For any with ,
so the geometric series comparison would put in , contradicting the definition of . This proves the radius of convergence property.
For , the ratio is , so the geometric series criterion gives
The inequality gives, for ,
For , the terms have magnitude at least and therefore do not tend to zero, so the series diverges by the term test for divergence. Hence

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.