Suppose that were a Finite Galois extension with Galois group and unramified away from . Its quadratic subfield is the fixed field of the alternating subgroup . A quadratic field ramified only at must be : the classification by fundamental discriminants shows that is the only nontrivial quadratic discriminant supported at . In particular, ramifies in this quadratic subfield.
Because does not divide , all ramification at is tame ramification. Its inertia group is therefore cyclic. Its image in is nontrivial because the quadratic subfield is ramified, so the inertia group is generated by a transposition and has order two; it cannot have order six because it is cyclic.
The discriminant exponent of a tame Galois extension is therefore
There is no other finite ramification, so .
On the other hand, the Minkowski bound for ideal classes implies the Minkowski lower bound for a number-field discriminant
Since , the right side is smallest at and is greater than . This contradicts , so no such extension exists.
Put , so and . The primes and are ramified:
Thus the finite modulus in the question is
The ray class exact sequence, with no real component in the modulus, gives
The Chinese remainder theorem for unit groups and the ramification relations yield
The image of kills the coming from . Consequently the kernel of the map from the ray class group to the ordinary class group is
Since the given class number is two, .
It remains to distinguish from . Let
The prime splits in , and represents the nontrivial ordinary ideal class because no element of has norm . Direct multiplication, or comparison of norms and valuations at the two primes over , gives
Modulo , the element is . Modulo , its class is nontrivial and has order three because . Hence the ray class of has order six: its square is a nontrivial element of order three in the congruence kernel. The remaining order-two factor of that kernel, coming from , is independent of . Therefore

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.