Every model of becomes an -structure by forgetting the symbols outside , so has an infinite model. If is an -sentence, completeness of gives either or . Accordingly either or . The two cannot both occur because is consistent. Therefore is a complete -theory with infinite models.
Yes. By the Ryll-Nardzewski theorem, aleph-zero-categoricity of says that, for every , only finitely many -formulas in variables exist modulo equivalence over . The -formulas form a subcollection. Moreover, two -formulas are equivalent modulo exactly when their universal equivalence sentence belongs to , equivalently when it follows from . Thus there are only finitely many -formulas modulo in each arity. Applying Ryll-Nardzewski again proves that is aleph-zero-categorical. This is the reduct of an aleph-zero-categorical theory property.
No. Let have unary predicates and a unary function . Let say that and partition the universe into two infinite sets and that is an involution mapping bijectively onto . This is a complete theory. In every infinite cardinal , a model of total size has , and any two such bijections are isomorphic. Hence is -categorical for every infinite .
Take . The reduct theory merely says that and are two infinite parts. At any uncountable , it has one model with and , and another with . They are not isomorphic. Therefore is not -categorical, giving the reduct need not preserve uncountable categoricity counterexample.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.