Because , the relation is reflexive. If and , thenso it is transitive. It is not symmetric: forone has but not .
Suppose . Define the nonnegative tuple coordinatewise byWhen , support inclusion forces , so in every coordinate.
Conversely, if with , then implies . Hence and . This proves the equivalence.
The definition saysEquality of sets is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive, so is an equivalence relation. Its classes are indexed by all subsets of , and every subset occurs as the support of its zero-one indicator vector. The number of classes is therefore
For uniqueness, if , orthogonality forces , hence . If , the condition forces , hence . Every coordinate is therefore forced, proving uniqueness.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.