Because , the relation is reflexive. If and , then
so it is transitive. It is not symmetric: for
one has but not .
Suppose . Define the nonnegative tuple coordinatewise by
When , support inclusion forces , so in every coordinate.
Conversely, if with , then implies . Hence and . This proves the equivalence.
The definition says
Equality of sets is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive, so is an equivalence relation. Its classes are indexed by all subsets of , and every subset occurs as the support of its zero-one indicator vector. The number of classes is therefore
Define
Then , the support of lies in , and the support of is disjoint from . Thus and .
For uniqueness, if , orthogonality forces , hence . If , the condition forces , hence . Every coordinate is therefore forced, proving uniqueness.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.