The first condition is that is Markov with transition semigroup
. The second is that, for every function
,is a martingale.
. The second is that, for every function
,is a martingale.
The first condition implies the second by conditioning over a short time interval, using
, summing increments, and passing to the limit. This is Dynkin's formula.
, summing increments, and passing to the limit. This is Dynkin's formula.
Conversely assume the martingale problem for a continuous-time Markov chain. Fix and a function , and putThe backward equation gives . Applying the martingale identity to this time-dependent function shows that is a martingale. Therefore, for ,Taking indicator functions proves both the Markov property and the transition semigroup .
Write for the degree of in and for the number of its neighbours lying in . Each trial succeeds with probability
. The stated geometric-sum fact shows that the total holding time at is exponential with rate . Conditional on success, each neighbour in is chosen uniformly. Hence
. The stated geometric-sum fact shows that the total holding time at is exponential with rate . Conditional on success, each neighbour in is chosen uniformly. Hence
LetFor every edge of ,Thus detailed balance holds, so is invariant. Connectedness of makes the chain irreducible and this invariant distribution unique.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.