Applying the Itô formula to and the semimartingale gives
Hence
The first term is a continuous local martingale and the second has finite variation. By uniqueness of the continuous semimartingale decomposition, could be a local martingale only if the finite-variation term were constant. Its derivative is not zero almost everywhere, so is not a local martingale.
Enlarge the space by an independent Brownian motion and define
The two terms have zero cross-variation and
The Lévy characterization of Brownian motion makes a Brownian motion. The residual has zero quadratic variation and is therefore constant, so
An -diffusion solves the martingale problem for
for every ,
is a local martingale. Applying this to cutoff approximations of and shows that
is a continuous local martingale with
Part b gives . Changing the sign of predictably where , and filling the zero set with independent Brownian noise, produces a Brownian motion such that . Thus

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.