The displayed kernel is the growing-mode result of standard perturbation theory in cosmology. Its assumptions are a Newtonian, weak-field, subhorizon treatment of pressureless cold matter; a single-stream, irrotational velocity field; and negligible velocity-dispersion tensor of collisionless matter, so . The background is the Einstein-de Sitter universe, which makes the growing mode proportional to and permits the separated powers . The density contrast is assumed perturbatively small and the decaying solutions are discarded. Gaussian initial conditions are not needed to derive , but they are needed for the loop contractions in the later parts.
For symmetrized standard perturbation theory density kernels, the two one-loop contractions are
and
The factors and count the relevant Wick contractions. Since the cross-correlation occurs in both orders, the one-loop matter power spectrum is
Put , , and . Direct substitution into gives
Using in part ii therefore yields
For , . Including the equal soft region and using gives
For , the constant and linear hard-momentum terms cancel, displaying the ultraviolet softness of the second-order density kernel. Since ,
The angular integral then gives
The leading infrared terms cancel in the observable sum:
This infrared cancellation in large-scale structure follows from the Equivalence principle: a sufficiently long-wavelength displacement translates short-scale structure without changing an equal-time power spectrum.
The ultraviolet part of is proportional to and depends on the cutoff . The leading deterministic effective field theory of large-scale structure counterterm has exactly this shape,
Its cutoff-dependent part can be chosen as
which cancels the stated . The ultraviolet contribution begins at and, when cutoff sensitive, is absorbed by higher-derivative or stochastic counterterms.
Physically, coarse graining the matter equations does not justify setting the short-scale stress to zero. Unresolved multistreaming and nonlinear motion generate an effective pressure and viscosity. Their leading derivative contribution to the Euler equation is proportional to , producing the required correction and making long-distance predictions independent of the arbitrary cutoff.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.