Suppose and . Then the colon ideal properly contains because it contains . If also , then properly contains . The maximality of in the family makes both larger ideals lie outside the family. Applying the stated closure condition with and would imply lies outside the family, a contradiction. Hence or , and is a prime ideal. This argument is the Prime ideal principle for an Oka family.
Let be the proper nonprincipal ideals. A chain in has a nonprincipal union: if its union were , then would belong to one member of the chain, forcing that member to equal the union and be principal. The union is also proper. Thus Zorn lemma gives a maximal member whenever is nonempty.
The family satisfies the condition from part (a). Indeed, suppose
Write and , where . Every has , so and . Conversely because , while because . Thus , proving . Hence is principal.
If a nonprincipal ideal existed, part (a) would therefore produce a nonprincipal prime ideal, contrary to the hypothesis. Every ideal is principal, so the integral domain is a principal ideal domain.
Suppose first that is a unique factorization domain, and let be a minimal nonzero prime ideal. Choose and factor it into irreducibles. In a UFD each irreducible is a prime element, so one factor belongs to . The nonzero prime ideal must equal by minimality.
Conversely, the ascending chain condition in the Noetherian domain implies that every nonzero nonunit factors into irreducibles. Let be irreducible and choose a prime minimal over . The Krull principal ideal theorem gives . Since is a domain and , it is a minimal nonzero prime and hence is principal, say . The divisibility and irreducibility of force to be associate to , so is prime. Thus every irreducible is prime, proving that is a UFD. This is the Minimal-prime criterion for a Noetherian unique factorization domain.
Let be a principal ideal domain that is not a field. A PID is Noetherian and is a unique factorization domain. Every nonzero prime ideal is generated by a prime element. If
then , so primality of makes a unit or an associate of . The proper alternative is , and every nonzero prime is therefore maximal. Since has a nonzero prime ideal, its Krull dimension is exactly one.
Conversely, let be a Noetherian UFD of Krull dimension one. Every nonzero prime is minimal among nonzero primes, and the forward argument in part (c) makes it principal. The zero ideal is principal as well, so part (b) shows that is a PID. A field has Krull dimension zero, hence is not a field.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.