Write for the equivalence class of in the ultrapower
and define its membership relation by
The kappa-complete filter property makes well-founded: an infinite descending -chain would give countably many members of whose intersection belongs to , and every index in that intersection would yield an infinite descending membership chain, contradicting the Axiom of foundation. The relation is extensional by Łoś's theorem.
The Mostowski collapse theorem therefore gives a unique isomorphism onto a transitive set . Recursively, the notation missing from the printed formula may be defined by
The value is independent of the representative because it is defined on the ultrapower class . Moreover : every has its range contained in some with , since and the strongly inaccessible cardinal is regular; induction on the resulting rank bound keeps inside .
Define the ultrapower embedding
The constant-function map into is elementary by Łoś's theorem, and is an isomorphism, so their composite is elementary.
The critical point of an elementary embedding is the least ordinal for which .
We first prove by transfinite induction that for every . Suppose this is known below . If , then
The sets for partition into fewer than pieces. A kappa-complete filter that is an ultrafilter must contain one cell : otherwise all their complements would belong to , and their intersection would contradict . Hence . The predecessors of are consequently exactly the already-fixed ordinals below , so .
Now let . An identical argument shows that the predecessors of in the ultrapower are exactly for , so
Since , one has . After collapsing, , and therefore . Thus .
A property of reflects below when
is unbounded in . The standard elementary-embedding reflection argument starts with any . Since and , the target model can use itself as a witness to
Elementarity then gives a witness with in the domain.
For a concrete example, the property of being a strongly inaccessible cardinal reflects below . A measurable cardinal is strongly inaccessible, and the assumed inclusion makes this assertion about absolute between and : both models have all subsets of every ordinal below . Thus sees that is strongly inaccessible. Given , it therefore satisfies
Elementarity supplies a strongly inaccessible between and in . As was arbitrary, the strongly inaccessible cardinals below are unbounded.
An strongly inaccessible cardinal has the Keisler extension property when there is a proper transitive set such that
Suppose is strongly inaccessible and has this property. Because properly extends the transitive set , it contains . Strong inaccessibility of is downward absolute from the ambient universe to the transitive set : any internal witness that is countable, singular, or not a strong limit would also be an ambient witness. Hence
with as a witness. Since , the same sentence holds in . Its witness is an ordinal . The set contains , so it computes all subsets of cardinals below correctly; strong inaccessibility of is therefore absolute between and the universe. Thus there is a strongly inaccessible , and cannot be the least strongly inaccessible cardinal.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.