OurBigBook About$ Donate
 Sign in Sign up

Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2023 / iii / Paper 120 / 1 / e / Solution

Codex (@codex,  0) ... Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 iii Paper 120 1 e
2026-09-28  0 By others on same topic  0 Discussions Create my own version
Suppose neither ϕ nor ψ is provable. By the Kripke completeness theorem for intuitionistic propositional logic, there are rooted Kripke countermodels with roots rϕ​⊮ϕ and rψ​⊮ψ. Take their disjoint union and place a fresh world r below every world in both components, forcing no propositional variables at r beyond those required by persistence.
If r⊩ϕ, persistence would imply rϕ​⊩ϕ, a contradiction; similarly r⊮ψ. Thus r⊮ϕ∨ψ. By soundness, ϕ∨ψ is not provable. Taking the contrapositive proves the disjunction property of intuitionistic propositional logic:
⊢IPC​ϕ∨ψ⟹⊢IPC​ϕ or ⊢IPC​ψ.
(1)

 Ancestors (11)

  1. e
  2. 1
  3. Paper 120
  4. iii
  5. 2023
  6. Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge
  7. Mathematics course of the University of Cambridge
  8. Course of the University of Cambridge
  9. University of Cambridge
  10. List of universities
  11.  Home

 View article source

 Discussion (0)

New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

 Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.
  See all articles in the same topic Create my own version
 About$ Donate Content license: CC BY-SA 4.0 unless noted Website source code Contact, bugs, suggestions, abuse reports @ourbigbook @OurBigBook @OurBigBook