Put
With the by design matrix , the scalar-on-function linear model becomes
The ordinary least squares estimator based on the truncated model is
Thus the omitted tail produces the conditional bias .
Let
The supplied weak law of large numbers and noise limit give
For a general fixed basis, need not vanish, so the retained coefficients are asymptotically biased and the estimator is inconsistent even for . Moreover, with fixed it cannot recover the full slope when .
If the form the eigenbasis of , then
The retained functional principal component scores are therefore uncorrelated with every omitted score, so . The least-squares estimates of are consistent despite truncation. Fixed still estimates only the projection ; consistency for the complete function requires the truncation level to increase and the tail error to vanish.
Let and define the roughness penalty matrix
For , the loss is the quadratic function
Its normal equations are
Whenever is positive definite, the unique minimizer is
For the usual choice , the penalty matrix is positive semidefinite, so full column rank of suffices. Since the question permits arbitrary real , a sufficiently negative value can make the quadratic form indefinite; then the loss is unbounded below and no minimizer exists. In the singular positive-semidefinite case, the Moore-Penrose inverse describes the minimum-norm solution whenever the normal equations are consistent.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.