The Weinstein neighborhood theorem states that if is a compact Lagrangian submanifold of , then neighborhoods of in and of the zero section in its cotangent bundle are symplectomorphic. The symplectomorphism restricts to the identity on , and the canonical form on is taken with the sign matching the chosen convention.
Take . For any Lagrangian embedding of into a symplectic four-manifold, the symplectic form identifies the normal bundle with . The self-intersection formula and the Euler characteristic give
up to the harmless orientation sign. If a smooth isotopy displaced , its final image would represent the same homology class but have intersection number zero with , a contradiction. This is the smooth non-displaceability from self-intersection.
For a compact ambient example, equip with . Its diagonal
is Lagrangian because the two summands cancel on , and the preceding argument shows that it is not smoothly displaceable.
Let with an area form and let be an equator dividing the sphere into two open hemispheres of equal area. Every curve in a symplectic surface is Lagrangian. A small normal push moves to a nearby latitude, so it is displaceable by a smooth isotopy.
Suppose a symplectic isotopy had final image disjoint from . The curve must lie in one hemisphere. Of the two discs bounded by , the one contained in that hemisphere has area strictly below half the total area, and the other has area strictly above half. On the other hand, a symplectomorphism maps the original two hemispheres to the two discs bounded by and preserves their areas, so both would have half the total area. This contradiction is the symplectic non-displaceability of an area bisector.
Let
For any sufficiently small nonzero , translation
is a symplectic isotopy with . Choosing arbitrarily small makes the isotopy arbitrarily small in every norm.
This isotopy has nonzero flux homomorphism, represented by . In contrast, every Hamiltonian isotopy has zero flux. If a Hamiltonian image were disjoint from , the two homologous essential circles would bound an annulus , and evaluation of the flux on would equal the signed symplectic area
which is nonzero. This contradicts vanishing Hamiltonian flux, so is not Hamiltonian displaceable.
Again take a symplectic two-sphere, but let be a small latitude bounding a cap of area strictly below half the total area. A rotation carrying that cap to a disjoint cap carries to a disjoint Lagrangian circle. Rotations of the symplectic sphere are flows of Hamiltonian vector fields; for rotation about an axis, a height function is a Hamiltonian function. Thus this rotation is a Hamiltonian isotopy, and is Hamiltonian displaceable.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.