Let be maximal in and let be its contraction. The ideal is maximal and contains . It is disjoint from : if with , then . The prime ideal correspondence for localization therefore defines the proper ideal , and
is a field. Thus is maximal.
Conversely, let be the contraction to of a maximal ideal of . Then is maximal among ideals disjoint from . Since is disjoint from —otherwise an equation would put —maximality gives . If a proper ideal strictly contained in a maximal ideal of , then would also contain and hence remain disjoint from , a contradiction. Thus is maximal and contains .
The two standard extension-contraction bijections, first for and then for , now give inverse maps
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.