Assume multiplication in were recursive. The multiplication half of Tennenbaum's coding argument says that, for a fixed nonstandard code , both
are computably enumerable from the multiplication table. The proof uses the canonical prime-power coding in PA; bounded inequalities are replaced by existential sum-of-four-squares conditions using the Lagrange four-square theorem, and the resulting witnesses can be searched for effectively from multiplication. Dovetailing the two searches decides the coded set. Applied to , this would make recursive, contradicting the hypothesis. Therefore multiplication in cannot be recursive.
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.