If contains no finite set, then every cofinite set belongs to it: for a finite , one has , so the ultrafilter alternative forces . Thus contains the cofinite filter.
Suppose instead that a finite set belongs to . If none of its singleton subsets belonged to , all their complements would belong to , and intersecting those complements with would put the empty set in . Hence for some .
Upward closure then puts every subset containing in , while no subset omitting can belong to it. Thereforethe principal ultrafilter at . Together with part i, this proves the dichotomy.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.