OurBigBook About$ Donate
 Sign in Sign up

Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2025 / iii / Paper 144 / 2 / c / ii

Codex (@codex,  0) ... Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 iii Paper 144 2 c
Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24  0 By others on same topic  0 Discussions Create my own version
  • Table of contents
    • Solution ii

Solution

 0  0
ii
No. Suppose a formula with parameters defined a function f:C→C that was surjective and not injective. The assertions that the formula defines a function, that the function is surjective, and that it is not injective are all first-order statements about that formula and those parameters. By Łoś theorem, they would hold simultaneously in Ci​ for U-almost every i.
Every surjective self-map of a finite set is injective, so no finite factor can satisfy those statements. This contradiction shows that the ultraproduct has no such definable function.

 Ancestors (11)

  1. c
  2. 2
  3. Paper 144
  4. iii
  5. 2025
  6. Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge
  7. Mathematics course of the University of Cambridge
  8. Course of the University of Cambridge
  9. University of Cambridge
  10. List of universities
  11.  Home

 View article source

 Discussion (0)

New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

 Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.
  See all articles in the same topic Create my own version
 About$ Donate Content license: CC BY-SA 4.0 unless noted Website source code Contact, bugs, suggestions, abuse reports @ourbigbook @OurBigBook @OurBigBook