The composite is proper, hence separated. If two lifts solve a valuation-ring lifting problem for , they also solve the corresponding problem for . The valuative criterion for separatedness for makes them equal, so is separated.
It remains to prove existence. Start with a square
After composing the lower map with , properness of gives a lift over whose generic restriction is . The two maps and from to agree on and have the same composite with . Since is separated, its valuative uniqueness criterion gives . Hence is the required lift for .
The morphism is of finite type by hypothesis, and it is separated and satisfies valuative existence. The valuative criterion for properness therefore proves that is proper.
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.