The composite is proper, hence separated. If two lifts solve a valuation-ring lifting problem for , they also solve the corresponding problem for . The valuative criterion for separatedness for makes them equal, so is separated.
It remains to prove existence. Start with a squareAfter composing the lower map with , properness of gives a lift over whose generic restriction is . The two maps and from to agree on and have the same composite with . Since is separated, its valuative uniqueness criterion gives . Hence is the required lift for .
The morphism is of finite type by hypothesis, and it is separated and satisfies valuative existence. The valuative criterion for properness therefore proves that is proper.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.