Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 iii Paper 8 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For fixed , Gaussian decay of gives locally uniform convergence of the theta function series and all its -derivatives. It is therefore entire. Shifting the series argument and reindexing givesSince , the corresponding second multiplier for has the opposite sign:Thus obeys and . These give candidate period lattices; to show they are exact, first locate every zero.
At ,because the terms with indices and cancel. The absolute convergence justifies that pairing. Quasi-periodicity propagates this zero to every .
For exhaustiveness and simplicity, let . It satisfies and . Take a fundamental parallelogram for , translated so its boundary has no zero. The two sloping edges cancel by the first identity; the bottom and reversed top giveThe argument principle therefore counts one zero with multiplicity in every cell. Since a known zero class already exists, all zeros are simple and exactlyThe denominator's simple zeros are instead . These two cosets are disjoint: cannot lie in because . Thus there are no cancelled zeros or poles in the quotient.
Any period of or must translate its zero set onto itself, so must belong to . A translation multiplies by ; the quotient is nonconstant, so an odd cannot be a period of . Squaring removes precisely that sign. This proves the period lattice of theta3 over theta4 and its squared counterpart:The second lattice is for the squared function; no additional translation can preserve its zero set.