Write , and . The polar amplitude equations are
with their reflected counterparts. On the equal-amplitude standing wave branch , equilibrium point requires
Squaring and adding eliminates the phase:
For the candidate squared amplitudes are
For each positive root, set and . The quadratic identity ensures these define a phase. Conversely these phase equations imply the quadratic, so a nonzero phase-locked branch exists exactly when the discriminant is nonnegative and at least one root is positive.
Since , the discriminant condition is the printed for . It is sufficient under the usual above-onset supercritical assumptions , because then the plus root is positive. Without these assumptions the condition is not sufficient: satisfies it but gives . This is the positivity condition for a phase-locked standing wave, not a removable algebraic detail. The zero solution always exists and is distinct from the nonzero branch. For , the undivided equations must be used; a nonzero equilibrium point in this fixed rotating frame requires and . If , nonzero equilibrium points require and a compatible phase, with no cubic amplitude selection.
Strong enough forcing can overcome the nonlinear frequency shift, lock the sum phase to the external signal and produce a standing wave at half the forcing frequency. The difference phase remains free through spatial translation. The amplitude inequality is an existence condition, not a stability theorem: attraction requires the linearized forced amplitude equations, and nonlinear coefficients have not been restricted enough here to promise stability of every root.