Original solutions to all three questions of the University of Oxford Part B algebraic number theory paper, sat on 30 May 2023. Source: Oxford's released examination PDF, bundle pages 241–242; paper pages 1–2. The cover prints the formal code A12171W without a final digit. In 2(b)(iii), the printed assertion about a principal ideal domain is false as written; the solution identifies the error and proves the intended principal ideal ring assertion and its consequence.
Past exam of the algebraic number theory course of the University of Oxford 2023 2 b iii Solution 2026-10-25
The printed domain assertion is false. For example, take and . Then has the nonzero zero divisor , so it is not an integral domain and cannot be a principal ideal domain. The valid conclusion is that is a principal ideal ring. This error is present in the original PDF, not just its transcription.
To prove the corrected conclusion, factorinto powers of distinct nonzero prime ideals. These powers are pairwise comaximal ideals. Indeed, a maximal ideal containing two such powers would contain both underlying prime ideals, forcing them to be equal. The Chinese remainder theorem givesEvery factor is a principal ideal ring by the preceding part. Every ideal in a finite direct product of rings is a product of ideals in the factors: multiplication by the coordinate idempotent elements separates the coordinates of every element of . Write . Thenso is a principal ideal ring. This proves the principal ideal property of quotients of a Dedekind domain in the present setting. In fact, this finite quotient ring is an integral domain precisely when is a prime ideal, in which case it is a field.
For the final deduction, choose any and apply the result to the nonzero proper ideal . The ideal of is generated by one residue class , which can be represented by . For each , some satisfies . HenceThis proves two generators for an ideal in a Dedekind domain; moreover, its first generator can be any prescribed nonzero element of .
For a Dedekind domain and a nonzero proper ideal , the quotient ring is a principal ideal ring. First, the correspondence theorem for ideals and unique factorization of ideals in a Dedekind domain show that the ideals of are exactly , . Consecutive powers are distinct by cancellation of invertible fractional ideals. Choose . There is no intermediate ideal between these consecutive powers, so . Multiplication by and substitution show inductively that for every . Taking gives a single generator modulo . Now factor into pairwise comaximal ideals . The Chinese remainder theorem writes as a finite direct product of rings of the preceding type, which is a principal ideal ring. It need not be an integral domain, as demonstrates. Applying the result to for any makes cyclic, yielding two generators for an ideal in a Dedekind domain.