Past exam of the chemistry B course of the University of Cambridge 2023 Paper 2 B8 c ii Solution 2026-10-20
The terminal nitrosyls are linear in both proposed electron-precise structures; the formal M–M bond orders are V–V double and Fe–Fe single. Use three-electron terminal linear NO donors, three-electron -NO bridges, and five-electron neutral Cp donors in covalent counting.
For the vanadium dimer the two metal fragments together containA metal–metal bond of order adds to each local count, so gives and 18 electrons per V. For an ionic cross-check, Cp is , each linear terminal NO is conventionally NO, and each bridge is represented as NO. ThusEach V then has electrons.
The iron species is monoanionic, and is a pyrazolate bridge binding through its two nitrogens. This is a four-electron donor overall in ionic counting, or three overall in neutral counting. The carbonyl bridge supplies two electrons overall. The covalent fragment total is consequentlyTherefore gives . In the formal NO description,Each Fe receives electrons. The negative formal oxidation state follows from the chosen nitrosyl assignment and the overall charge; omitting that charge would change the count.
Bent terminal NO ligands would supply fewer neutral-count electrons and demand much higher formal M–M bond orders to attain 18-electron counts. The linear assignments give the ordinary double and single bond solutions. Since NO is a non-innocent ligand, these oxidation states are formal bookkeeping limits, not measured metal charges; actual nitrosyl bending and M–M bond strengths require structural and spectroscopic evidence.[ref]
Principles of structure, bonding, and reactivity for metal nitrosyl complexes by John H. Enemark and Richard D. Feltham. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 13, pp. 339–406; formal nitrosyl assignments and distinction from actual electron distribution