Joints theorem 2026-10-07
The number of joints of a line collection formed by distinct real affine lines in is at most . The pruning and minimal-degree polynomial argument proves this bound. The exponent is sharp: the coordinate-line grid has joints of a line collection and lines. In three dimensions the bound is .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 9 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
For a finite collection of distinct affine lines in a vector space in , , a joint is a point incident to lines whose direction vectors are linearly independent. The joints theorem assertsIn the customary three-dimensional formulation this is , with three noncoplanar incident lines at every joint. We prove the general form, which includes that formulation.
Let and . The conclusion is immediate when . Otherwise set . Suppose for contradiction that . Repeatedly delete any line incident to at most of the currently retained joints, deleting those joints at the same time. Each deleted line loses at most current joints, so even deleting all lines could lose at most joints. Therefore the process must stop with a nonempty set and a line collection such that each retained line contains more than retained joints. Every retained joint still has its original independent incident lines: if any line through it had been deleted, the joint would have been deleted too.
There is a nonzero multivariate polynomial of total degree at most vanishing on , becauseChoose such a polynomial of smallest possible total degree . This is an application of the polynomial method in combinatorics. Every line of contains more than roots of a polynomial of its polynomial restriction to a line, so vanishes identically on every such line.
At a retained joint , differentiating along each of its independent line directions gives . Their linear independence therefore forces . Each partial derivative of vanishes on all of and has smaller total degree. Minimality of forces every partial derivative to be the zero polynomial. Over the real numbers, a polynomial with all partial derivatives zero is constant; a nonzero constant cannot vanish on the nonempty . This is the required contradiction.
It follows that . Since for ,This proves the joints theorem by the pruning and minimal-degree polynomial argument.