Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 56 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For a homogeneous canonical inflaton, and . Vacuum domination by a scalar field requires positive potential energy to dominate both kinetic energy and any competing material components. Then and the expansion is nearly vacuum-like. Exact scalar-driven acceleration requires , equivalently ; potential domination is a stronger condition.
The slow-roll approximation additionally neglects compared with in the inflaton equation of motion. Define the unreduced Planck mass ; it differs from the reduced Planck mass by . Sufficient potential-flatness conditions aretogether with approach to the slow-roll attractor. The reduced equations are and .
For , take and the positive-field rolling branch. ThenThe field velocity is constant to this order. Choosing the start at gives the quadratic-potential slow-roll solutionThe PDF puts inside this square root; the converted TeX incorrectly moves it outside. Next integrate :Thus the number of e-folds is the logarithmic expansion, not the expansion factor itself:Here . The usual quadratic-inflation endpoint estimate sets , givingThis is an endpoint estimate, not an exact result from the full equations. Exact acceleration ends at the Hubble slow-roll parameter , equivalently . Inserting the slow-roll velocity into that last condition instead gives ; the different order-one coefficient illustrates the failing approximation at the endpoint. A precise value requires the full scalar and Friedmann evolution. The large initial-field contribution to is unaffected by that order-one uncertainty.
Finally gives . The quadratic-inflation expansion from Planck density is thereforeFor this is enormous and the initial field is in the slow-roll regime. No unique numerical factor follows without specifying . Extrapolating the classical model from Planck density is only a formal estimate; it does not establish control of quantum-gravity corrections at that starting scale.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 53 3 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
For the quadratic-potential slow-roll solution, , so . Inflation ends when , giving . The slow-roll e-fold count remaining before that endpoint isWith , this gives and . The quadratic-inflation amplitude calibration isMatching the supplied amplitude therefore givesTaking , this is . Retaining produces the small correction; dropping it gives almost the same leading slow-roll estimate.
The scalar spectral index isIt agrees with the supplied central value and lies well inside the stated uncertainty interval. This conclusion concerns the scalar tilt; the tensor prediction is a separate test of the same model.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ii Paper 4 9B Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-10-14
The flatness problem is that the observed cosmological density parameter is close to , although in an ordinary decelerating universe any departure from one grows with time. Extrapolation backward therefore requires implausibly precise early cancellation of the curvature term.
The cosmological perfect-fluid continuity equation isConsequentlyFor an expanding universe . Ifthen increases. The Friedmann equation impliesIt therefore decreases during this period, driving toward one. By the Friedmann acceleration equation, the same condition gives when the cosmological constant is included in the effective fluid. This is the inflationary solution of the flatness problem.
For the scalar field, the slow-roll approximation meansThe equations reduce toTaking the positive-field branch gives , and thereforeWith ,Now integrate :Thus the quadratic-potential slow-roll solution isFinally,so equivalently