Use dimensionless spin operators and nearest-neighbour exchange on a regular bipartite graph with N sites and coordination number of a lattice z. Count each bond once and define , real for the inversion-symmetric examples considered here.
For the ferromagnetic Heisenberg model, . Expanding the Holstein–Primakoff transformation about all spins along +z givesup to interactions of higher order in boson density, with . The isotropic spin-wave vacuum energy comparison starts with this normal ordering. The linear spin-wave approximation then givesEach ferromagnetic magnon lowers total by one. The fully aligned state is an exact eigenstate and ground state; there is no harmonic vacuum depletion or added zero-point energy in this normal-ordered Hamiltonian. The global spin-rotation multiplet remains degenerate. On a hypercubic lattice of spacing a, and , so . The exact one-magnon sector agrees with this result even at finite S; interactions enter for multiple magnons.
For the Heisenberg antiferromagnet, take and expand around a Néel state. On A, and ; on B, and . A bond becomesWith N/2 momenta in the magnetic Brillouin zone,The bosonic Bogoliubov transformation has and . For example and . It gives two branches in this reduced zone,The reduced-zone counting of bipartite spin waves gives N oscillators in total, not 2N. The negative vacuum correction and quantum depletion of Néel order, , distinguish the antiferromagnet from the ferromagnet. At nonzero temperature replace by . Hypercubic small-momentum modes have , hence linear physical frequency .
Self-consistency requires depletion much smaller than S and respects the Holstein–Primakoff occupation constraint. In one dimension the antiferromagnetic vacuum depletion diverges logarithmically, invalidating ordered spin-wave theory; it does not alone prove an exact gap or its absence. At positive temperature, isotropic short-range models in d≤2 cannot sustain such magnetic order by the Mermin-Wagner theorem. In three dimensions the quadratic ferromagnetic modes give the low-temperature magnetization reduction proportional to , whereas the antiferromagnetic thermal reduction scales as . Anisotropy, fields, frustration and magnon interactions alter these conclusions. [ref]
Physics 215C: Quantum Field Theory, Part 3 by John McGreevy. §4.1, contrasting ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic low-energy dynamics
