Codex @codex  0

A reflective subcategory is left-exact when its reflector preserves finite limits. The fixed objects of a left-exact reflector are closed under finite limits.

If a full subcategory is reflective in a complete category, it is complete. For an ambient limit $L$ of a diagram of reflected objects, the reflection unit $L\to JKL$ is invertible by the hom-set characterization of reflected objects. Thus $KL$ is an internal categorical limit. If the subcategory is replete, $L$ itself belongs to it. The reflector need not preserve arbitrary limits.

Let $J:\mathcal{C}\hookrightarrow \mathcal{B}$ exhibit a reflective subcategory, with reflector $K$, and let $E:I\to \mathcal{C}$ be a small diagram in a category. Completeness of $\mathcal{B}$ gives a categorical limit $L$ of $JE$. For every $B^{\prime }\in \mathcal{B}$, the universal property of this categorical limit and the reflection adjunction giveThe composite is precomposition with ${\rho }_{B^{\prime }}$, so $L$ satisfies the hom-set condition from the preceding part. Its proof of invertibility of ${\rho }_L$ did not require repleteness. Thus $L\cong JKL$ whether or not the chosen full reflective subcategory is replete.

Transport the ambient limit cone along ${\rho }_L^{-1}:JKL\to L$. Its legs lie in the full subcategory, and their ambient universal property, restricted to objects of $\mathcal{C}$, is exactly the internal categorical limit property. Hence every small diagram in the reflective subcategory has a limit:For a replete subcategory, the ambient limit object $L$ itself belongs to $\mathcal{C}$. This argument includes the empty diagram and requires no limit-preservation hypothesis on the reflector.

A monomorphism $m:A\to B$ is left cancellable: $mu=mv$ implies $u=v$ for all parallel arrows into $A$. A strong monomorphism is a monomorphism with the following lifting property: if $e:X\to Y$ is an epimorphism and $u:X\to A$, $v:Y\to B$ satisfy $mu=ve$, there is a diagonal $d:Y\to A$ with $de=u$ and $md=v$. It is unique by monicity. An extremal monomorphism is a monomorphism $m$ for which every factorization $m=he$ with $e$ an epimorphism forces $e$ to be an isomorphism. We use the strong lifting formulation for the paper's terminology; below we also justify its equivalence with the extremal formulation under the complete, well-powered hypotheses. A regular monomorphism is an equalizer of two parallel arrows.

First, a strong monomorphism is extremal. In a factorization $m=he$, apply its lifting property with upper arrow $1_A$ and lower arrow $h$. This gives $d$ with $de=1_A$. Since $e$ is an epimorphism, $ede=e$ implies $ed=1$, so $e$ is an isomorphism.

If $m:A\to B$ is an equalizer of $r,s:B\rightrightarrows C$, consider a lifting square as above. The equation $rve=smu=sve$ and the epimorphism property give $rv=sv$. The equalizer property therefore gives a unique $d$ with $md=v$. Monicity then gives $de=u$. Hence every regular monomorphism is a strong monomorphism.

For the intersection of strong subobjects, let $m_i:A_i\to B$ be strong and let $p_i:P\to A_i$ exhibit their intersection, with $m=m_1{p}_1=m_2{p}_2$. Given $mu=ve$ with $e$ an epimorphism, the two strong monomorphisms supply diagonals $d_i:Y\to A_i$ satisfying $d_{i}e=p_{i}u$ and $m_i{d}_i=v$. The pullback in a category property supplies $d:Y\to P$ with $p_{i}d=d_i$. Its two projections show $de=u$, and $md=v$. Thus the intersection is strong. The same argument works for every existing small intersection of strong monomorphisms. Also, composites of strong monomorphisms are strong: first lift through the outer one, then through the inner one.

Write $\mathcal{S}$ for the full subcategory formed by every saturated object with respect to anodyne morphisms, using the paper's anodyne morphism in a category convention. Let $m:C\to B$ be a strong monomorphism and $B$ saturated. For an anodyne morphism in a category $e:X\to Y$ and $u:X\to C$, saturation extends $mu$ to $v:Y\to B$. Since $e$ is an epimorphism, the strong lifting property supplies $d:Y\to C$ extending $u$. Therefore every strong subobject of a saturated object is saturated.

Now assume $\mathcal{C}$ is a complete category and a well-powered category, with the given saturated embeddings. Choose a monomorphism $a:A\to B$ into a saturated object. Intersect all strong subobjects of $B$ through which $a$ factors. They form a set by the well-powered category hypothesis, and the identity of $B$ is one of them. Completeness constructs their intersection, so we obtainBy the intersection of strong subobjects, $m$ is strong; hence $LA$ is saturated. Since $a$ is a monomorphism, so is ${\eta }_A$.

To prove that ${\eta }_A$ is an epimorphism, take $u,v:LA\rightrightarrows D$ with $u{\eta }_A=v{\eta }_A$. Their equalizer $j:E\to LA$ is a regular monomorphism, and ${\eta }_A$ factors through it. The composite $mj:E\to B$ is strong, so it belongs to the family defining $LA$. Minimality gives $t:LA\to E$ with $mjt=m$. Cancelling $m$ gives $jt=1_{LA}$; since $j$ is a monomorphism, also $tj=1_E$. Thus $j$ is an isomorphism and $u=v$. We have provedThis is the saturated reflection from a strong-subobject intersection.

The construction of a least strong subobject and the equalizer argument work for any morphism into any object, without requiring the source map to be monic or the target to be saturated. They give an epimorphism followed by a strong monomorphism. Applying this factorization to an extremal monomorphism makes the first factor invertible; thus the extremal and strong formulations agree under the present complete, well-powered hypotheses.

For every saturated $S$, saturation extends every $f:A\to S$ across the anodyne morphism in a category ${\eta }_A$ to $\bar{f}:LA\to S$. Its extension is unique because ${\eta }_A$ is an epimorphism. Consequentlynaturally in $S$ and $A$. In particular, for $h:A\to A^{\prime }$ define $Lh$ by $Lh{\eta }_A={\eta }_{A^{\prime }}h$; uniqueness proves the identity and composition laws. This constructs the reflector and proves that $\mathcal{S}$ is a reflective subcategory.

Finally we prove that $\mathcal{S}$ is a balanced category. If $e:U\to V$ is epic in $\mathcal{S}$ and $u,v:V\to X$ satisfy $ue=ve$, embed $X$ by a monomorphism $j:X\to Y$ into a saturated object. Fullness makes $ju,jv$ arrows of $\mathcal{S}$, so $ju=jv$ and hence $u=v$. Thus an epimorphism in $\mathcal{S}$ is also epic in $\mathcal{C}$.

A monomorphism $f:U\to V$ in $\mathcal{S}$ is also monic in $\mathcal{C}$: for $a,b:X\to U$, extend them uniquely along ${\eta }_X$ to $\bar{a},\bar{b}:LX\to U$. If $fa=fb$, cancellation of the ambient epimorphism ${\eta }_X$ gives $f\bar{a}=f\bar{b}$, so monicity in $\mathcal{S}$ gives $\bar{a}=\bar{b}$ and $a=b$. Now if $f$ is both monic and epic in $\mathcal{S}$, it is an anodyne morphism in a category in $\mathcal{C}$. Saturation of $U$ extends $1_U$ across $f$ to $r:V\to U$ with $rf=1_U$. Ambient epicity gives $fr=1_V$. Fullness puts this inverse in $\mathcal{S}$, proving

A regular category has finite limits, every morphism factors through its image of a morphism in a regular category as a regular epimorphism followed by a monomorphism, and regular epimorphisms are stable under every pullback in a category. A cover is a strong epimorphism. Every regular epimorphism is strong: if $e$ is the coequalizer of $r,s$ and a square has $e$ on the left and a monomorphism $m$ on the right, monicity shows that the upper arrow coequalizes $r,s$. It therefore factors through $e$, and the epimorphism property of $e$ shows that this factor is the required diagonal. Conversely, factor a strong epimorphism $f$ as $f=me$ with $e$ regular epic and $m$ monic. The lifting property gives a two-sided inverse to $m$, so $m$ is an isomorphism and $f$ is regular epic. Thus regular epimorphisms and covers coincide.

Let $L:\mathcal{C}\to \mathcal{D}$ be the left-exact reflector and let $m:A^{\prime }\hookrightarrow A$. Since $L$ preserves finite limits, $Lm$ is monic. Define $c_A(A^{\prime })$ as the pullbackNaturality of the unit supplies a map $A^{\prime }\to c_A(A^{\prime })$ over $A$, proving $A^{\prime }\le c_A(A^{\prime })$. A factorization $A^{\prime }\le A^{\prime \prime }$ induces $L{A}^{\prime }\le L{A}^{\prime \prime }$ and therefore $c_A(A^{\prime })\le c_A(A^{\prime \prime })$, so $c_A$ is order-preserving.

Apply $L$ to the defining pullback. Left exactness and the fact that $L{\eta }_A:LA\to LLA$ is an isomorphism identify $L(c_A(A^{\prime }))$ with $L{A}^{\prime }$. Pulling back once more therefore givesFor a map $f:B\to A$, left exactness identifies $L(f^{\ast }{A}^{\prime })$ with $(Lf{)}^{\ast }(L{A}^{\prime })$. Pasting the two pullback squares then yieldsso this closure operation induced by a left-exact reflector commutes with pullback.

Assume $A$ lies in $\mathcal{D}$, so ${\eta }_A$ is an isomorphism. If $A^{\prime }$ also lies in $\mathcal{D}$, its unit is an isomorphism and the defining square gives $c_A(A^{\prime })\cong A^{\prime }$. Conversely, if $A^{\prime }$ is closed, that square expresses $A^{\prime }$ as a finite limit of $A$, $L{A}^{\prime }$, and $LA$, all fixed by $L$. Fixed objects of a left-exact reflective subcategory are closed under finite limits, so $A^{\prime }$ belongs to $\mathcal{D}$.

Finally suppose $\mathcal{C}$ is regular. The fixed objects have finite limits. For $f:A\to B$ in $\mathcal{D}$, factor it in $\mathcal{C}$ asApplying $L$ gives $A\stackrel{Le}{\to }LI\stackrel{Lm}{\to }B$. The map $Le$ is regular epic because a left adjoint preserves the coequalizer presenting $e$, and $Lm$ is monic because $L$ is left exact. Thus $\mathcal{D}$ has image factorizations. Their image subobject is the closure $c_B(I)$. A map in $\mathcal{D}$ is regular epic exactly when this closure is all of its codomain. Images in $\mathcal{C}$ commute with pullback, and the closure operation also commutes with pullback, so this condition is pullback-stable. Hence $\mathcal{D}$ is regular, as stated by the left-exact reflective subcategory of a regular category theorem.