Codex @codex  0

Work in natural units $k_B=\hslash =c=1$, initially neglecting helium and excited hydrogen states. The reaction $p+e^{-}\leftrightarrow H+\gamma$ is in chemical equilibrium when ${\mu }_p+{\mu }_e={\mu }_H$, since equilibrium photons have zero chemical potential. Substitution of the nonrelativistic Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution for the three densities givesFor ground-state hydrogen use $g_e=g_p=2$, $g_H=4$, and $m_H\simeq m_p$ in the translational prefactor. Writing its Hydrogen binding energy as $I$, this becomes $(m_{e}T/(2\pi ){)}^{3/2}{e}^{-I/T}$. Charge neutrality gives $n_p=n_e=X_e{n}_B$, while baryon conservation gives $n_H=(1-X_e)n_B$. Hence the hydrogen-only Saha equation isThe photon Bose-Einstein distribution supplies $n_{\gamma }=2\zeta (3)T^3/{\pi }^2$, where $\zeta (3)$ is the usual Riemann zeta function value in the thermal number integral. With baryon-to-photon ratio ${\eta }_{\gamma }=n_B/n_{\gamma }$, substitution yieldsThis reproduces the requested numerical coefficient, with the printed $\xi (3)$ interpreted as the thermal $\zeta (3)$ value. There is a normalization ambiguity in the PDF: it writes $\eta =n_B/s$ without defining $s$. To reproduce this coefficient, $s$ must mean photon number density. If $s$ has its usual entropy density meaning, the Saha baryon-abundance normalization instead givesThe two forms agree through ${\eta }_{\gamma }=[{\pi }^4{g}_{\ast s}/(45\zeta (3))]{\eta }_s$, with the entropy sector specified. A baryon-to-entropy ratio cannot simply be inserted into the photon-normalized expression.

As the universe cools, the Boltzmann factor favors neutral atoms and cosmological recombination sharply lowers $X_e$. For an order-one ionized fraction the photon-normalized equation gives the balanceup to an order-one ionization-fraction factor. The small baryon abundance means that there are very many photons per baryon: even a small high-energy photon tail can ionize most atoms. Thus the recombination temperature is far below the microscopic binding scale $I\simeq 13.6\mathrm{eV}$, typically a few tenths of an eV for the standard abundance, rather than of order $I$.

Photon decoupling is a related but distinct kinetic event. The Thomson scattering rate $n_e{\sigma }_T$ falls relative to $H$ as free electrons disappear, and photons begin free streaming. The precise last-scattering epoch depends on integrated optical depth, not only the local equality of rates. At still lower density the effective recombination rate per electron also drops below the expansion rate. Residual electron freeze-out leaves a small nonzero ionized fraction, larger than the vanishingly small equilibrium Saha prediction; radiative atomic bottlenecks mean the entire history cannot be obtained from equilibrium alone.

The temperature comparison in the last request needs an interpretation. If “reionisation temperature” means the microscopic thermal ionization scale, the large photon-to-baryon ratio explains why cosmological recombination requires $T\ll I$. If it means later cosmic reionization, there is no universal thermal threshold: stars or other sources supply ionizing photons and can reheat gas. The cosmological photon background is actually colder at that later epoch, because $T_{\gamma }\propto a^{-1}$. Its temperature therefore cannot literally be higher than the background temperature at recombination merely because hydrogen is reionized.

There are about ${\eta }^{-1}\sim 10^9$ photons per baryon. Even when the typical photon energy is below the Hydrogen binding energy, the high-energy tail can provide abundant ionizing photons. The nonrelativistic electron's translational phase space also favours the ionized state. Quantitatively, the Saha equation contains both suppressing factors $\eta$ and $(T/m_e{)}^{3/2}$. Recombination needs their tiny product to be overcome by $e^{I/T}$, so $I/T$ must be several tens, not of order one.

For an illustrative ${\Omega }_B{h}^2=0.02$, the supplied baryon-to-photon relation gives $\eta =5.36\times 10^{-10}$. With $m_e=5.11\times 10^5\mathrm{eV}$, direct evaluation givesThus the equilibrium ionization fraction reaches a few per cent just below $0.3\mathrm{eV}$, while at $13.6\mathrm{eV}$ it is essentially unity. The exact temperature depends weakly on the baryon abundance and on the fraction used to define cosmological recombination. This is small baryon abundance delays hydrogen recombination. Recombination, photon decoupling and residual electron freeze-out are related but distinct: the last two involve rates and cannot be determined by chemical equilibrium alone.

Photon decoupling is a dynamical loss of frequent scattering, distinct from the chemical conversion of charged particles into neutral atoms. Before recombination, Thomson scattering on free electrons keeps photons coupled to the baryon plasma. The physical scattering rate isin units with $c=1$. Define the approximate decoupling temperature byEquivalently the photon mean scattering time becomes comparable to an expansion time. A refined last-scattering definition uses the optical depth and the maximum of the visibility function; it need not coincide exactly with the local rate criterion. As $X_e$ falls, scattering becomes inefficient, ordinarily after the half-ionized recombination stage, so $T_{\mathrm{dec}}<T_{\mathrm{rec}}$.

Residual electron freeze-out concerns the remaining ionized fraction. The Saha equation presumes sufficiently rapid forward and reverse reactions to maintain chemical equilibrium. Real recombination is slowed by radiative bottlenecks and expansion; the free-electron fraction can therefore exceed its equilibrium value. Eventually the effective recombination rate per free electron, roughly ${\alpha }_{\mathrm{eff}}(T)n_e$, falls below $H$. The remaining electrons cannot all find and recombine with protons within an expansion time. A small nonzero residual fraction survives while the Saha prediction decreases exponentially toward zero.

The sketch shows this lag and residual floor. Its kinetic curve and the position of the decoupling marker are schematic: the data supplied determine the equilibrium curve, but not a quantitative recombination history or an exact $T_{\mathrm{dec}}$. Determining those needs the expansion history and atomic transition rates. The horizontal axis decreases toward the right to follow cosmological cooling.