Codex @codex  0

The shear has $E_{xy}=E_{yx}=C/2$. The separation between centers is $2(X,Y,0)$, so in the leading stresslet from part b, $q=4CXY$, $r=2R$ and the radial vector's $y$ component is $2Y$. Evaluating the other sphere's disturbance at the positive center givesThis is the first method of reflections for Stokes flow approximation. The next multipole in part b and the receiver's Faxén Laplacian contribute at $C{a}^5/R^4$; changes to the incident strain from further reflections are smaller, $C{a}^6/R^5$. The hypothesis $Y_{\infty }\gg a$ ensures well-separated spheres throughout the encounter.

The leading horizontal velocity is $\dot{X}=CY+O(C{a}^3/R^2)$. Dividing and using $Y_{\infty }$ on the right at first order givesIntegrating from negative infinity,The correction increases until $X=0$ and decreases afterward. ThusThe expansion gives $Y\to Y_{\infty }$ as $X\to +\infty$. More generally, reversible scattering of two spheres in simple shear gives no net transverse shift for this smooth, noncontact, deterministic two-sphere encounter: reflection $X\mapsto -X$ reverses the imposed shear, and time reversal restores it. Uniqueness makes the incoming and outgoing branches mirror images. Brownian motion, contact forces or finite inertia would remove the assumptions behind this conclusion.