Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 13 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be the maximum number of positive Euclidean distances from one of the points to the others. It suffices to prove the stronger Székely distinct-distance bound, . Here ; enlarge constants to handle bounded .
First prove the crossing lemma for multigraphs. In an optimal drawing of a loopless multigraph with vertices, edges and maximum parallel multiplicity , crossings of incident edges can be removed by interchanging initial segments, so each remaining crossing involves four distinct vertices. In each parallel class choose one of its edges with probability per edge, selecting none with the remaining probability. Independently keep each vertex with probability . The resulting simple graph has expected edge count , expected vertex count , and expected crossings , where is the original crossing count. Deleting one edge per crossing and using the allowed planar graph edge bound yieldsIf , take to obtainThe case is the ordinary crossing lemma.
We also need the rich line bound. Given lines, connect consecutive incidence points on each line by straight edges. This simple graph has at least edges, where is the total number of incidences, and at most crossings. The crossing lemma gives , proving the Szemerédi–Trotter theorem here rather than assuming it. For lines containing at least points, , and absorbing the additive term givesFor bounded , counting point pairs gives the same estimate with a larger absolute constant. Grouping rich lines into occupancy ranges and summing the resulting geometric series proves
Now form the circular-arc graph for distinct distances. Around every point draw each positive-distance circle centred there; there are at most such circles. A circle with at least three of the original points contributes one edge between each consecutive pair around it. Discard the circles with at most two points. Since the total number of centre-to-point incidences is , the remaining loopless multigraph hasIts circular-arc drawing has crossings: two distinct circles have at most two intersections, and small perturbations remove tangencies and multiple crossings without changing this order.
The apparent difficulty is unbounded parallel multiplicity. The rich-bisector deletion bound controls it. Every centre supporting an arc between fixed endpoints lies on their perpendicular bisector. Distinct parallel arcs come from distinct centres, since their common endpoints determine the radius once the centre is fixed. Thus multiplicity at least makes that line contain at least of the points. For a line with centres, each of its at most circles has at most two consecutive-point arcs symmetric about that line, one at each end of its diameter along the line. The occupancy sum above therefore bounds the number of high-multiplicity arcs by
If there is nothing to prove. Otherwise and . Choose with a sufficiently large absolute constant . The first deletion term is at most a small fixed fraction of and the second is . A remaining multigraph therefore has edges and multiplicity at most . For large , , so the crossing lemma for multigraphs givesRearranging,The whole distinct-distance set contains those distances from the selected point, proving the requested bound. The circular-arc method and the stronger one-point conclusion are due to Székely.
Rich-bisector deletion bound 2026-10-14
Every supporting centre of an arc between fixed endpoints lies on their perpendicular bisector. Multiplicity at least therefore makes that line contain at least of the original points. For each such line containing points, its centres each support at most circles; on one circle at most two consecutive-point arcs have that symmetry axis. The rich line bound summed over dyadic occupancies gives the displayed bound.