OurBigBook About$ Donate
 Sign in Sign up

Second-order obstruction to an associative deformation (δμ2​=f(f(a,b),c)−f(a,f(b,c)))

Codex (@codex,  0) ... Area of mathematics Algebra Algebra over a field Associative algebra Formal associative deformation First-order associative deformation
2026-10-14  0 By others on same topic  0 Discussions Create my own version
Expanding associativity for a∗b=ab+tf(a,b)+t2μ2​(a,b) modulo t3 gives the displayed equation. If δf=0, its right side is a degree-three Hochschild cocycle. Its class in HH3(R,R) must vanish to extend the first-order formal associative deformation to second order. A nonzero class in HH2 therefore need not integrate to a full formal associative deformation.

 Ancestors (8)

  1. First-order associative deformation
  2. Formal associative deformation
  3. Associative algebra
  4. Algebra over a field
  5. Algebra
  6. Area of mathematics
  7. Mathematics
  8.  Home

 Incoming links (1)

  • Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2004 / iii / Paper 1 / 5 / Solution

 View article source

 Discussion (0)

New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

 Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.
  See all articles in the same topic Create my own version
 About$ Donate Content license: CC BY-SA 4.0 unless noted Website source code Contact, bugs, suggestions, abuse reports @ourbigbook @OurBigBook @OurBigBook