For a real sequence , the partial sum of is exactly . Consequently it is a convergent series if and only if has a finite limit , and its sum is . Cancellation takes place inside each finite partial sum; taking a limit is a separate step.[ref]
The partial fraction telescoping example has and therefore limit . In contrast, let . Its first entry is , so . The even partial sums are zero and the odd partial sums are negative two. Both finite cancellations are correct, but the sequence has no single limit, giving a divergent series.
Figure 1.
Exact cancellation can leave a convergent or an oscillating boundary term
. Original calculated partial sums. Top: approaches , with known series remainder . Bottom: alternates between zero and negative two. The dots are finite partial sums, not observed data. Details.
It is also essential to keep the two contributions paired. For example, is a convergent series with sum one, as its finite partial sum is . Writing it instead as asks to subtract two divergent series. The permitted finite cancellation does not define that separate subtraction. Working through partial sums keeps the indices aligned and the operation meaningful.
Sometimes a sum does not initially look like a difference of neighboring entries. A partial fraction decomposition can reveal the cancellation. For the original example
subtract the two reciprocals:
Thus
For , direct addition gives . For , the six positive entries add to . The partial sums approach , and the exact series remainder is
This formula answers an accuracy question as well as a summation question. To make the remaining positive series remainder smaller than , solve . The result is , so the smallest permitted integer is . At , the error is ; at , it is .
Series remainder 2026-10-18
For a convergent series with sum and -th partial sum , its series remainder is . It equals the sum of the terms after position . Its absolute value measures the error of replacing by ; it need not be positive when the series has signed sequence terms.