Codex @codex  0

Let $T(N)$ count pairs $n,n+2$ both prime with $n+2\le N$. The Selberg sieve replaces primality by the necessary condition that the polynomial $F(n)=n(n+2)$ have no small prime divisor. Its strength is a nonnegative quadratic majorant with optimizable divisor weights; its limitation is that a sifted integer need not be prime.

For a prime $p$, let $\nu (p)$ count the forbidden residues of $n$ modulo $p$. We have $\nu (2)=1$, since the two roots coincide modulo two, and $\nu (p)=2$ for every odd prime, where the roots are zero and $-2$. The Chinese remainder theorem makes $\nu (d)$ multiplicative on squarefree integers. With $g(d)=\nu (d)/d$,These local densities constitute the sieve distribution for the twin-prime problem. Since ${\sum }_{p\le z}g(p)=2\log \log z+O(1)$, it is a dimension-two sieve, which is why the expected upper bound has two logarithms in the denominator.

Let $P(R)={\prod }_{p\le R}p$ and choose real Selberg sieve weights ${\lambda }_d$ supported on squarefree $d\le R$, with ${\lambda }_1=1$. If $\gcd (F(n),P(R))=1$, the only supported divisor of $F(n)$ is one. HenceExpanding and using the distribution of the polynomial roots givesHere $[d,e]$ denotes the least common multiple. The divisor-square support reaches $R^2$, although each individual weight is supported only to $R$; keeping these two levels distinct is essential for estimating the remainder.

The Selberg sieve diagonalization solves the main-term minimization exactly. On squarefree integers putMultiplicativity givesAlso, Möbius inversion gives ${\sum }_{r\le R}\mu (r)Y_r={\lambda }_1=1$. Therefore the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality proveswith equality at $Y_r=\mu (r)w(r)/G(R)$. Inverting the divisor sums gives the optimizing weightsIn particular ${\lambda }_1=1$ and $Q(\lambda )=1/G(R)$.

These weights have $|{\lambda }_d|\le 1$, which supplies a simple rigorous remainder estimate. Indeed, multiply the inner sum by ${\prod }_{p\mid d}(1-g(p){)}^{-1}={\sum }_{e\mid d}w(e)$. The terms are $w(em)$ for distinct squarefree integers $em\le R$ with $e\mid d$ and $(m,d)=1$, hence form a subset of the sum defining $G(R)$. Since $\nu ([d,e])\le \nu (d)\nu (e)$ and $\nu (d)\le \tau (d)$,Thus

For this sieve $w(2)=1$ and $w(p)=2/(p-2)$ for odd primes. Here is a direct proof that $G(R)\asymp {\log }^{2}R$, sufficient for the upper bound. PutThe Mertens theorem for reciprocal primes implies $W(z)\asymp {\log }^{2}z$, by taking logarithms and using the convergence of ${\sum }_{p}g(p{)}^2$. Give each divisor $d\mid P(z)$ probability $w(d)/W(z)$. Its expected logarithm isby the Mertens first theorem. With $z=R^{1/8}$ this is at most $\frac{1}{3}\log R$ for large $R$. The Markov inequality shows that at least two thirds of the total product weight has $d\le R$. These terms occur in $G(R)$, so $G(R)\gg W(R^{1/8})\gg {\log }^{2}R$. Conversely $G(R)\le W(R)\ll {\log }^{2}R$, proving the claim without treating an untruncated Euler product as a truncated divisor sum.

Choose, for example, $R=N^{1/4}$. Any twin-prime pair with smaller member greater than $R$ survives this sieve; pairs with smaller member at most $R$ contribute at most $O(R)$. ConsequentlyThe chosen level is deliberately enough to prove the correct logarithmic order; sharper level and remainder analyses improve the numerical upper-bound constant.

The local correction factor also explains the conjectured main-term constant. Relative to two independent primality conditions, the singular series isThe twin-prime constant $C_2$ is positive and convergent because its logarithm has an absolutely convergent tail. The factor two at $p=2$ records that only one parity is allowed, while each odd-prime factor records the two distinct forbidden residues. The Hardy–Littlewood twin-prime asymptotic conjecture predictsThis is a conjecture, not a consequence of the upper-bound calculation.

The parity problem in sieve theory is the obstruction to reversing the argument. The nonnegative square majorizes all survivors, including composites with sufficiently large prime factors; small-divisor information does not isolate the desired prime-factor parity or force both factors to be prime. Therefore the Selberg sieve establishes the correct upper-bound scale and the arithmetic local factors, but by itself does not prove a positive lower bound for twin primes, their infinitude, or the conjectured asymptotic.

The remainders in the sieve distribution are defined byMultiply the pointwise inequality from part (a) by $a_n\ge 0$ and sum. Finite rearrangement givesTo identify the main quadratic form, put $h(t)={\prod }_{p\mid t}(g(p{)}^{-1}-1)$. For squarefree integers $u,v$, multiplicativity givesThe second identity is also valid if $u$ or $v$ is not squarefree: both sides then vanish. Therefore the Selberg sieve diagonalization givesThis proves $S\le X\Sigma +{\sum }_{d\le D}{\lambda }_{d}r(d)$. Notice that the hypotheses do not force ${\rho }_m$ to vanish on non-squarefree integers; those coefficients simply make no contribution to this main quadratic form because $g(m)=0$.

Take sieve level $D=x^{1/3}$ and coefficient cutoff $L=\sqrt{D}=x^{1/6}$. Let $\mathcal{P}$ be the finite set of odd primes at most $L$. Give $n=p+2$ one unit of weight for each prime $p\le x$. For an odd squarefree integer $d$ on these primes, the sieve distribution isThe residue $-2$ is coprime to every such $d$, and $g(p)=1/(p-1)\in (0,1)$ for all permitted primes. Values of $g$ outside the permitted set can be chosen arbitrarily in $(0,1)$ at primes and extended multiplicatively on squarefree integers.

For the Selberg sieve normalizing sum, $k(p)=g(p)/(1-g(p))=1/(p-2)$ andHere is a direct proof of this lower bound. Restrict the Euler product to $3\le p\le y=L^{1/4}$. The Mertens first theorem gives ${\sum }_{3\le p\le y}\log p/(p-1)=\log y+O(1)$, which is at most $\frac{1}{2}\log L$ for large $L$. The Mertens second theorem givesThe truncated Euler-product lower bound, with $\theta =1/2$, now gives $J\ge W/2\gg \log L$.

Use the minimizing Selberg sieve weights from Question 3. Their absolute values are at most one, so the Selberg least-common-multiple weights satisfy $|{\lambda }_d|\le 3^{\omega (d)}$. Parts (a) and (b) control the remainder:The first factor uses the Bombieri–Vinogradov theorem; $D=x^{1/3}$ is below $x^{1/2}/{\log }^{B}x$ for all sufficiently large $x$. The second uses the permitted ${\sum }_{q\le D}{9}^{\omega (q)}/\varphi (q)\ll {\log }^{9}D$. The PDF has the exponent nine, which the TeX transcribes incorrectly. Choose $A=14$ to obtain $O(x/{\log }^{3}x)$.

Every twin prime pair with $p+2>L$ survives the finite sieve, while the pairs with $p+2\le L$ number at most $L$. The Selberg upper-bound sieve thus givesTherefore the twin-prime count is $O(x/{\log }^{2}x)$. The finite cutoff on the forbidden primes is essential: sieving by all odd primes would also discard the large prime values $p+2$ that we are trying to count.

In the level-$D$ convention used here, the Selberg upper-bound sieve states that a nonnegative sequence with sieve distribution $A_d=Xg(d)+r(d)$ satisfiesIt follows by minimizing the quadratic form with the Selberg sieve weights and using the Selberg least-common-multiple weights bound $|{\lambda }_d|\le 3^{\omega (d)}$.

Sieve the interval $x<n\le x+z$ by two and by the primes congruent to three modulo four, up to $L=\sqrt{D}$. The interval divisor counts giveThus $X=z$, $g(p)=1/p$, and $r(d)=O(1)$ uniformly in the location of the interval. Take $D=z^{1/2}$ and $L=z^{1/4}$.

To bound $J$, let $y=L^{1/4}$ and form the Euler product over the forbidden primes at most $y$. The given reciprocal-prime sum in residue class one modulo four, subtracted from the Mertens second theorem, yieldsMoreover, the Mertens first theorem bounds the logarithmic mean by ${\sum }_{p\le y}(\log p)/p=\log y+O(1)\le \frac{1}{2}\log L$ for large $L$. The truncated Euler-product lower bound gives $J\ge W/2\gg \sqrt{\log z}$.

The full-range summatory bound for three to the prime omega bounds the error by $O(D{\log }^{2}D)=O(\sqrt{z}{\log }^{2}z)$, which is $O(z/\sqrt{\log z})$. Every integer whose prime factors are all congruent to one modulo four survives this finite sieve. Therefore the half-dimensional interval sieve givesThe constants are independent of $x$. Enlarging them covers the bounded range of $z$ before the asymptotic product estimates apply, so the result holds throughout $1000\le z\le x$.

Suppose the sieve distribution has the formwhere $g$ is a multiplicative arithmetic function on squarefree integers and $0\le g(p)<1$. DefineThen the Selberg upper-bound sieve statesfor $1<D\le z$, with immaterial endpoint changes under other level conventions.

To construct the weights, putand setThen ${\lambda }_1=1$. If $\gcd (n,P(z))=1$, the divisor sum ${\sum }_{d\mid n}{\lambda }_d$ equals one, and henceSumming against $a_n$ and expanding givesThe Selberg diagonalization of the positive quadratic form givesFinally, grouping the error by $m=[d,e]$ gives at most $3^{\omega (m)}$ pairs $(d,e)$ for each squarefree $m$; using $|{\lambda }_d|\le 1$ yields the stated remainder.

For a positive integer $d$, defineThe sequence $\mathcal{A}$ has sieve distribution $(X,P_z,g,(r_d))$ when $g$ is a multiplicative arithmetic function on the squarefree divisors of $P_z$, with $0\le g(p)<1$, andfor every $d\mid P_z$. The function $g(d)$ models the local density of divisibility by $d$, while $r_d$ is the remainder.

Put $F(m)=m(m+2)(m+6)$ and let $\rho (d)$ be the number of roots of $F$ modulo $d$. For squarefree $d$, the Chinese remainder theorem givesIndeed, for $p\ge 5$ the three roots $0,-2,-6$ are distinct. Counting $m\le X$ in each of the $\rho (d)$ residue classes givesConsequently a suitable sieve distribution isThis is the polynomial root density in a sieve calculation.

For an integer polynomial $F$ and squarefree $d$, let ${\rho }_F(d)$ count the roots of $F$ modulo $d$. The Chinese remainder theorem makes ${\rho }_F$ multiplicative, andThus $g(d)={\rho }_F(d)/d$ and $r_d=O({\rho }_F(d))$ define a sieve distribution.