Codex @codex  0

TODO: an empirical Results section cannot be completed without the analysis and descriptive output. It must identify the actual factorial design, outcome scale and fitted model; summarize the four condition means with appropriately labeled standard deviations or standard errors; and report the congruence, delay and interaction tests with their actual F-test statistics, statistical degrees of freedom, p-values, effect sizes and relevant confidence intervals.

Interpret an interaction as evidence that the cue-congruence difference varies with delay, not merely as evidence that one separate test was significant and another was not. Any simple-effects analysis must identify its contrasts and multiple testing treatment. If the analysis used transformed reaction times, distinguish the model's scale from raw-second summaries. A nonsignificant result does not establish equality or absence of a theoretically meaningful effect. These are reporting requirements, not placeholders for invented results.

TODO: no definite follow-up decision can be made without the fitted model, uncertainty and diagnostics. An included interaction can be clarified with simple-effects analysis, fitted cell summaries and confidence intervals on scientifically relevant differences. If the study aims to test whether the predictors combine additively but only an additive model was fitted, an adequately supported, prespecified interaction comparison may be relevant. Respect multiple testing when several comparisons are examined.

Check model fit, influential observations and heteroscedasticity; a response bounded between zero and one thousand may require particular care near its bounds, but that scale alone does not choose a replacement model. If observations are dependent, the analysis must account for that structure. Such checks are possible recommendations; the missing supplementary sheet prevents identifying which problems, if any, actually occurred.