If has finite categorical limits, every functor preserving pullbacks in a category also preserves equalizers, even when it does not preserve a terminal object. Factor it through the slice category by sending to . This lifted functor preserves pullbacks because the slice forgetful functor reflects them; it also preserves the terminal object, so it preserves finite limits. The slice forgetful functor preserves equalizers, completing the proof.
Finite completeness of slice categories Created 2026-10-07 Updated 2026-10-14
If a category has pullbacks in a category, each slice category is finitely complete. The identity of the base object is terminal in the slice. Ambient pullbacks in a category inherit a unique common structure map to the base and satisfy the same universal property over that base. A terminal object and pullbacks in a category construct finite products in a category and equalizers, hence all finite limits.
A category with finite limits is locally Cartesian closed when every slice category is a Cartesian closed category. Covariant set-valued functor categories on small categories have this property, using the equivalence between their slices and functor categories on categories of elements.
For a locally small category , the covariant Yoneda lemma gives a bijection
natural in and the functor . The inverse sends to the natural transformation whose component at maps to . Naturality of at forces this formula, proving both inverseness and uniqueness.
Write for the category of elements of . Its objects are with , and an arrow is an arrow satisfying .
Given an object of the slice category , define
An arrow acts by the restriction of ; naturality of makes this restriction well-defined. A slice morphism restricts to a map between the corresponding fibers and thus gives a natural transformation on .
Conversely, given , set
and let be projection to . The functor laws and naturality follow from those for and . On morphisms use the maps on each summand. Taking a fiber of this disjoint union recovers canonically. Taking the disjoint union of the fibers of recovers by , naturally in and in the slice object. These are inverse natural isomorphisms, proving
This is the slice of a set-valued functor category construction.
Now assume is a small category, so is small. Define a diagram in a category
For in , its reverse arrow acts by precomposition . There is a cocone to with component . To verify its colimit property directly, use pointwise colimits of sets. At , a colimit element has a representative , and the induced map to sends it to . This map is surjective, since is represented by . Moreover, the element-category arrow gives precisely the colimit relation
Thus all representatives with the same image are equal in the colimit, proving injectivity. The resulting bijections are natural in . We have proved the canonical colimit presentation of a covariant set-valued functor:
A Cartesian closed category has finite products in a category and an exponential object for each pair, representing maps from a product with . In , the terminal functor and binary products are computed pointwise. Define the exponential of covariant set-valued functors by
Smallness makes this a set. If , precomposition with defines . Functoriality is immediate from associativity of composition. Its evaluation map of an exponential object is
For , naturality of shows , which is exactly the naturality equation for evaluation.
Given , define its currying at by
Naturality of proves that this is a natural transformation in , and its compatibility with arrows proves that is natural. Evaluation recovers by setting . Conversely, for , its naturality implies
so currying the evaluation composite recovers . These formulas give the required natural bijection, hence is Cartesian closed.
Finally, for every the small category has a Cartesian closed functor category by the same construction. The slice equivalence above transports its terminal object, products and exponentials to . The original functor category also has pointwise finite limits. Therefore it is locally Cartesian closed. Every construction here is explicit; no adjoint functor theorem is used.
Write an object of the slice category as . Its morphisms are arrows in commuting with these structure maps, and the forgetful functor removes the structure map.
Suppose a square in the slice becomes a pullback square in , with vertex . Given a compatible pair of slice arrows and , the underlying pullback gives a unique with the required projection equations. If is one projection, then
where is the structure map. Thus is automatically a slice morphism, and underlying uniqueness gives uniqueness in the slice. Hence reflects pullbacks.
Now let be an equaliser of slice arrows . Consider any underlying arrow with . Give the structure map . Then is a slice arrow into , and the slice equaliser gives a unique with . Conversely any underlying with that equation automatically obeys , so there are no additional factorization possibilities outside the slice. Therefore has the ordinary equaliser universal property in . This proves preserves equalisers.
Let be the unique arrow to the terminal object of . Define
This is a functor into the slice category , because , and . The terminal object of this slice is , exactly , so preserves the terminal object.
The composite preserves pullbacks by hypothesis, and reflects pullbacks by part (b). Part (a), restricted to the pullback shape, therefore shows that preserves pullbacks. The allowed finite-limit criterion now gives that preserves all finite categorical limits, and hence equalisers. Since preserves equalisers, their composite does too. Thus
This is equalizer preservation by pullback-preserving functors. The factorization supplies terminal-object preservation only in the slice; none is asserted for the original .
A local operator is an inflationary, idempotent, finite-meet-preserving map with , expressed in the internal logic of a topos. For a subterminal object with truth value , the closed local operator and quasi-closed local operator are respectively
The first is a local operator by distributivity. For the second put . Then , is order-reversing, and : the first inequality gives , while its application to gives the reverse inequality. Thus is inflationary and idempotent, and .
For meet preservation, monotonicity gives . Conversely put . From and , we obtain . Intersecting with gives , hence . This proves all local-operator axioms. Also and . Equivalently, it is the largest local operator leaving fixed: if , then
This explains the quasi-closed terminology as relative double negation above the closed bottom .
The subobject classifier of is the closed-subobject classifier . Its bottom is , its meet is inherited, its join is , and implication between closed truth values is the ambient implication. To verify the last claim, if , then
It follows that ; inflationarity gives equality and also .
Suppose . Every closed lies above , and its complement in is , also closed because . We have . Moreover , so . Thus the fixed truth values form a Boolean algebra, and the sheaf topos is a Boolean topos.
Conversely suppose the sheaf topos is Boolean and put . Complementation in its classifier is . Applying the double-complement identity to , and using the implication calculation above, gives
Therefore
For the cover, work in the slice category . Its generic subterminal object is . Form its quasi-closed Boolean subtopos , and compose its embedding with the slice projection to obtain . The slice projection has inverse image , and sheafification is left exact, so this is a geometric morphism.
To prove surjectivity, take a monomorphism with characteristic predicate , and suppose makes it invertible. Pullback to the slice followed by sheafification makes this exactly the assertion that it is -dense. Internally on , therefore,
for the generic truth value . Substitute by pulling back along the graph . The left side becomes , so and the original mono is invertible. Thus reflects invertible monos. If it identifies two parallel arrows, their equalizer becomes invertible; reflection then shows the arrows were already equal. Hence is faithful, and
The generic truth value is essential: substituting only a fixed global value such as would give a Boolean subtopos, but need not give a surjection onto the original topos.
A regular category has finite limits, coequalizers of kernel pairs, and regular epimorphisms stable under pullback. Equivalently, every morphism factors as a regular epimorphism followed by a monomorphism, and these factorizations are stable under pullback. A regular functor preserves finite limits and regular epimorphisms, hence also preserves these image factorizations.
For this question, the capital regular category convention is the one in which every well-supported object is a well-pointed object in a category. Here an object is well-supported if is a regular epimorphism. It is well-pointed if a subobject through which every point factors must be the whole object. This convention is documented in Definitions 1.1–1.3. It imposes no such point-detection requirement on objects whose support is a proper subobject of . In particular, it should not be replaced here by the stronger assertion that reflects every isomorphism.
First prove two facts about a capital regular category . Every well-supported object has a point. Otherwise is well-supported and has no points, so its diagonal contains all points and is invertible. That makes a subterminal object; the regular epimorphism is then also monic and hence invertible, contradicting the absence of a point. If is a regular epimorphism and is a point, its pullback in a category is a well-supported object over , so it has a point lifting . Thus the representable functor
preserves regular epimorphisms; it already preserves all existing limits. Hence is a regular functor. Second, if is a singleton, its unique point is a monomorphism, is well-supported, and contains all points of . Well-pointedness makes invertible. Thus reflects terminal objects, even though it need not reflect arbitrary isomorphisms.
Now let be a small category that is a regular category. For each object , its slice category is small and regular: finite limits, images and the stability of regular epimorphisms are computed using the corresponding constructions in . By the permitted capitalization result choose a conservative functor that is regular,
with a small capital regular category. The base-change functor , given by , preserves finite limits and regular epimorphisms. So does
Taking these as the coordinates defines a regular functor
The exponent is a set of indices, so this is a power of the Category of sets, with finite limits and regular epimorphisms computed coordinatewise.
To prove reflection of isomorphisms, suppose is invertible for . In , the object is the pullback of along the point given by the diagonal . Applying shows that is the fibre of the bijection over this diagonal point, and is a singleton. The preceding lemma gives through its canonical arrow to . Since reflects isomorphisms, is invertible. Its underlying morphism is . Therefore
In the small-category setting of this representation result, the elementary condition for replacing the power by one copy of is:
This is almost total support for a regular category. “Strict initial” means initial and every arrow into it is invertible; the condition allows the case in which all objects are well-supported and no initial object exists.
For necessity, let be regular and conservative. If , factor through its support of an object in a regular category . Preservation of images gives . Conservativity makes invertible, so is well-supported. If , then for every the projection is sent to the bijection , hence is invertible. Its inverse followed by the other projection supplies an arrow . For any two such arrows, their equalizer is sent to a bijection onto , hence is invertible, proving uniqueness. Thus is initial. If exists, then exists, so and that arrow is sent to a bijection. Conservativity makes it invertible. Hence is strict initial.
For sufficiency, choose the permitted conservative regular functor into a small capital regular category, and put . This is regular. A well-supported object of is sent to a well-supported object of , which has a point. A non-well-supported object is strict initial by the condition, and is consequently a proper subterminal object. The functor preserves subterminality and reflects the noninvertibility of its arrow to ; its image is a proper subterminal object and has no points. Thus is empty exactly on the non-well-supported objects.
Suppose is a bijection for . If both sets are empty, and are strict initial objects and is invertible. Otherwise are well-supported. Factor as a regular epimorphism followed by a monomorphism . Surjectivity of makes every point of factor through ; capitality of makes invertible. Hence is a regular epimorphism. Its kernel pair is well-supported, because and are regular epimorphisms. Injectivity of implies that every point of has equal coordinates, and therefore factors through the diagonal . Since is well-pointed, this diagonal is invertible. Thus is also monic, hence an isomorphism, and conservativity of makes invertible. This proves sufficiency with actual point and image arguments, rather than asserting that global sections of every capital regular category is conservative.
Here Cartesian category means a category with all finite limits. Let be a monomorphism, and let be universal membership for a power object . Pull it back to and then regard the result as a subobject of . Its unique classifier is an endomorphism : on a parameterized subobject it intersects with . Intersecting twice has the same result as intersecting once, so uniqueness of classification gives .
Take the equalizer of and the identity, and restrict membership to . For any subobject , its composite with is a subobject of , hence is uniquely classified by . Since it is contained in , its intersection with that subobject changes nothing, so and factors uniquely through . Conversely every map gives the original kind of family by pulling back the restricted membership. These inverse operations give
naturally in . Thus is a power object of a subobject, even if no power objects other than were assumed.
Now consider the slice category , which has finite limits formed by ambient pullbacks and has terminal object . The constant family has slice power object : for ,
and a classifier is equivalently the map over . Every family is a subobject of this constant family through its monic graph . Apply the first construction inside the slice. Consequently every slice of a Cartesian category with power objects again has power objects.
An object of the slice category is a morphism ; a map from to is with . The identity morphism is a terminal object of this slice category, even when itself has no terminal object.
For a cospan in the slice category, form its underlying pullback in a category in , with maps and . If are the structure maps to , then . This common map equips with its slice structure. An underlying mediating map into is automatically over , because its composite with is the prescribed structure map. Hence the same square is a pullback in a category in .
If a Cartesian category has power objects, its slice categories do too. In , the constant family has power object , since its product with a family is . An arbitrary family is a subobject of the constant family through its graph , so the power object of a subobject construction applies in the slice.
If every slice category is essentially small, the displayed exponential object and the set of sieves on a category at each are small even when is large. Together with pointwise finite limits, they give the elementary-topos constructions in a universe admitting the large diagrams. This does not force the entire functor category to be locally small in the original universe: a large discrete category has terminal slices, but maps between its constant-one and constant-two presheaves are arbitrary class-indexed binary families.