Write , , and . We first prove a constant-version spherical isoperimetric inequality directly, including regions with several boundary components.
If , the arithmetic bound already gives . If , a region with smooth boundary is empty or the whole connected sphere up to boundary-null changes, and its area product is zero. For , write the smooth boundary as finitely many disjoint simple closed curves of lengths . Fix a point on each curve. The shorter boundary arc from to any other point has length at most , so is contained in the closed geodesic ball of radius about .
The complement of that small ball is connected and lies entirely on one side of . The Jordan curve theorem therefore gives a disk bounded by contained in the ball. Its area satisfies
The indicator function of and the sum have the same jumps modulo two across every boundary curve. Their difference modulo two is consequently constant throughout the sphere off the boundary. Thus either or its complement lies in , up to its area-zero boundary. This also handles nested curves and disconnected regions. It follows that
Combining the cases, one valid universal choice is . Sharpness is not required.
For the inclusion estimate put , and . Splitting into its portions inside and outside gives
Because and , this expression lies between and . Apply the preceding spherical isoperimetric inequality to and divide by :
Thus the constant in the spherical inclusion area discrepancy is independent of the nonempty open set .
Let and be the old and new smooth Riemannian metrics. Their area forms satisfy
The determinant ratio is invariant under changes of coordinates, so is a globally defined smooth function. The layer cake representation follows from and Tonelli's theorem:
Smoothness makes every open. Compactness of the sphere gives . Multiply the inclusion bound by before integrating; for empty the resulting bound is trivially zero. For , and the discrepancy is exactly zero; for , is empty. Therefore
Dividing by proves
This constant depends only on the two metrics. If is constant the normalized areas agree exactly, as the bound also shows.